

‘Documentary’ - something that could be consumed in 10% of the time as an article.


‘Documentary’ - something that could be consumed in 10% of the time as an article.


Self driving is absolutely a thing. FULL self driving like what Tesla tries to bullshit about is a way off.


Kinda misses the point that star wars is space fantasy, not sci fi


How are scammers turning book club invites into money?


The WLTP is pretty accurate to the actual range I get on my BYD.


Tldr, rehash of news from 2024 (clinical trials) with no update since. Slow news day I guess


I was referring to societal development, not genetics. Some hyperbole may also be involved.


‘Rape’ is a pretty meaningless term in this context, given that we were closer to monkeys than modern humans at the time.


I know, but seeing as most of the content comes from the book…


We’re not discussing ‘typical’ workloads (whatever that is), we’re discussing one specific person’s use case, and you’ve somehow decided you know better than him without any information
Pretty common practice in places that are humid or close to the equator.

I did! Most of the arguments against basically boil down to ‘make it harder for the average user to do this’. In addition to the unequal access to information, sites like lemvote demonstrate how easy it will be for the average user to bypass the imaginary technical barrier. Sure, you may block it now, but as the Threadiverse grows so will the number of sites and such that do so. Even a browser extension ala RES. Even without the whack-a-mole issue, it’s only a matter of time before somebody sets up such an utility for public access with an obfuscated instance that can’t be easily blocked.

Security via obscurity🙄


Attitudes like yours are why it’s never going to be the year of the Linux desktop…


Almost 1/6 though the year, actually.
Google is not the arbiter of knowledge, but the combined search engines are certainly a decent indexer of it. To claim something is ‘common knowledge’ when we’re unable to find a hint of it anywhere online, and is based solely on something you read a couple decades ago, is pretty ridiculous.
Honestly if it was something you read 20 years ago and there’s nothing about it to be found today, there’s a chance it was nothing but racist nonsense. (Not saying you’re racist or anything, just that the source might have been and you got taken in).
Do you have a link I can read? I’m referring specifically to the part about centuries of built up excrement.
How would that test work more than once per student though