The individual electron just behaves randomly in a way that we can only predict statistically and not absolutely.
That’s the non-boring part, for lack of a better expression. Quantum Mechanics only predicts the outcome for an ensemble, and that imperfectly. It can say nothing at all about the outcome for a single particle.
It follows that somewhere out there, someone is numbering them.
Congress definitely can and should ban him from office but obviously won’t.
An a380 is so big when it takes off it looks like it’s moving slow, just kind of hanging in the air
For a second I thought this was Gary Larson’s vision of his life if the cartoon didn’t pan out.
tale as old as time
The wicked flee when none persueth.
My uncle told me he sailed through the Bermuda Triangle all the time. I thought he was full of crap.
They should have just made more trash robots.
Maybe she really worked at Carl’s Jr.
The first rule of the road is “right-of-way won’t help you when you’re dead”.
“Lefty Loosey righty tighty”
One arrow points up to the left, one points down to the left.
There are also video games in libraries, and there are books in libraries with components that are unusable these days. Nobody is required by law to support these components in perpetuity. Nor is any publishing company required by law to maintain support for a book in perpetuity in any way.
Nor is anybody required by law to help you fix your classic car. People with classic cars spend tons of money to find spare parts or even get them manufactured. This is despite the fact that cars are much more of a necessity than video games.
Likewise, if you paid a video game to keep their servers open, or paid them for their source code, they’d give it to you. If you paid a smart person to reverse engineer the network protocol and write an equivalent server, you’d have your part.
Yes, and if you don’t like it you don’t have to buy them. It’s why I prefer not to use Steam.
If games have to be playable in perpetuity, then you can’t buy a game that isn’t playable in perpetuity.
But what is also unreasonable is needless, always online DRM that shuts down one day.
There are lots of video games without forced online DRM, and video games aren’t a necessity. You can simply stop buying games from these services and let people who don’t care about such things continue to buy them.
So you want to legally require game companies to “preserve history” in perpetuity, unlike every other kind of company in existence?
’
The second sentence isn’t true.
Isn’t this a straight “eye-for-an-eye” revenge killing?