

Pronouns | he/him |
Datetime Format | RFC 3339 |
We don’t want to destroy the means of production, we want to seize them. And we have no issue with anyone’s personal property, now matter how “regular” a person they may be.
CTRL+M is like pressing ENTER. Kernigan & Pike, 1984: UNIX Programming Enviornment
RETURN is an example of a control character — an invisible character that controls some aspect of input and output on the terminal. On any reasonable terminal, RETURN has a key of its own, but most control characters do not. Instead, they must be typed by holding down the CONTROL key, sometimes called CTL or CNTL or CTRL, then pressing another key, usually a letter. For example, RETURN may be typed by pressing the RETURN key or, equivalently, holding down the CONTROL key and typing an ‘m’. RETURN might therefore be called a control-m, which we will write as ctl-m.
This has apparently been publicly available since at least 2010, because I found it in that year’s edition of A. J. Weberman’s Coup d’etat In America: The CIA and the Assassination of JFK
https://archive.org/stream/CoupDetatInAmerica/NODULE 18 OSWALD IN NEW ORLEANS_djvu.txt
OS INDICES RESULTS:
Laureano Batista, a 32 year old Cuban exile, was from a wealthy Cuban family and in Cuba he was a banker. He was granted a POA in December 1959 and an OA in February 1960 for use as a PP agent in Havana, Cuba.
A copy of a letter in Subject’s file dated November 22, 1963 signed by Subject as Secretary for Military Affairs, Executive Committee, Movimiento Democrata Cristiana (Christian Democratic Movement) is addressed to Major General Bela K. Kiraly, President, Hungarian Freedom Fighters Federation, Inc., and offered the services of the MDC in arranging meetings and discussions with other anti-CASTRO organizations and the Hungarian Freedom Fighters. The Hungarian Freedom Fighters were (deleted) was interested in information on the MDC before granting approval for contact between the two organizations.
The left doesn’t claim to be peaceful or tolerant of bigots or of private ownership of the means of production.
Given your transmisia and corporate bootlicking, I don’t think you’re going to last very long on lemmy.ml.
That doesn’t de jure apply to non-citizens at the border, never mind de facto.
Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: AI spam
Some people haven’t read the fourth book in Douglas Adams’ trilogy 😔
Next time, please read a community’s rules before posting to it.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Looking for support?
I answered this a month ago https://lemmy.ml/comment/16536763
The Schrödinger’s sarcasm edit 🙄
uyghurs
The US propaganda machine’s “Uyghur genocide” psyop has been debunked six ways to Sunday already. [1] [2]
.
tibetans
I’m pretty sure virtually all of the Tibetan people are happy to no longer be suffering under theocratic feudalism. Happy to no longer be illiterate serfs and slaves, suffering depredation under a god-king. I doubt many of them are sad that CIA asset Dalai “suck my tongue” Lama is in exile. [1] [2]
I have observed little to no presence of actual conservatives on this platform; beyond the horseshoe effect with the tankie crowd.
Not a real thing. “Tankies” are in no way “conservative.” They want socialism, while fascists want to kill socialists and maintain the capitalist order.
Marxists are anything but utopian, and I think you’ve bought into the just-so stories of bourgeois ideologues like von Mises, Hayek, Rothbart, and Greenspan.
A fascist “parody” account isn’t something that would be well-received on lemmy.ml, because we won’t allow it to become an “ironic” nazi bar like 4chan. Lessons were learned from Gamergate about fascist entryism into social media spaces. I’m not saying that you are doing that, I’m only explaining the reasoning behind defending against the possibility.
Your accent could use a buffing out.
This is one of bourgeois ideology’s last defenses: apathy.
That all the other systems are just as bad.
That it’s just “human nature.”
That there is no alternative.
Okay, horseshoe theorist. I also would recommend Stalin and Castro[1][2][3], as would others in this conversation.
Wow, I wonder what went on there…
Even in Stalin’s time there was collective leadership. The Western idea of a dictator within the Communist setup is exaggerated. Misunderstandings on that subject are caused by lack of comprehension of the real nature and organization of the Communist power structure. Stalin, although holding wide powers, was merely the captain of a team and it seems obvious that Khrushchev will be the new captain.
A lot of the cold war propaganda about the USSR turned out to be bullshit, now that US & Soviet archives have been released, as contemporary Western academic historians will tell you, like Domenico Losurdo and Grover Furr.