If any agent of the government tells you otherwise, you must educate them and enforce the free exercise of your own rights.

How exactly does one enforce the free exercise of their rights?

Remember that agents of the government are often armed and generally don’t like being told what to do.

This one was making a child with an HIV-positive parent resistant to HIV, so it’s a bit better than 731 torture.

I have problems with the doctors’ way of doing so, but their act was to allow an informed consenting(? it’s complicated) couple with an HIV-positive parent to have a child resistant to HIV. It was problematic, yes, but very different to the war crime experiments, much of which was simply about morbid curiosity and torture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He_Jiankui_affair

Laws were changed after this incident:

In 2020, the National People’s Congress of China passed Civil Code and an amendment to Criminal Law that prohibit human gene editing and cloning with no exceptions

So, in case you actually meant that weird ignorant remark you made about Uyghurs, the answer is no and no.

I don’t know anything about paid subreddits, but I’m talking about the notorious and overreaching censorship of Luigi Mangeoni, including people getting warnings for simply upvoting those posts. This was mentioned in some mainstream news articles so it’s a reasonably big wave.

Relevant: ^[source]

If we’re lucky, we might avoid the World Wars which made many other revolutions possible.

Textbooks.

Very relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

im sorry Carl Marcos is too advanced.

they keep saying 'In one word; ’ and then writing a whole paragraph. and why do they keep making economics all political?

What part of communism relys on everyone being on the same page?

The parts I talked about are more the groundwork of analyzing the here and now, rather than actually talking about it, yes. I was addressing the points about individualism and self-serving ‘nature’, to point out they were only capable of manifesting through feudalism, capitalism, etc., and aren’t some inherent immutable human nature. We know that egalitarian societies have been workable worldwide, it’s not some utopian idealist dream.

As for no-one coming up with workable alternatives, yes and no:

• There are examples of societies today which are anarchist and/or socialist instead of capitalist such as the Zapatista territories in Mexico (pop. ~300,000). Most of them are smaller pre-industrial societies, so we can’t just transplant their society structure into modern cities and expect it to work, but they’re still useful examples.
• The PRC presents one interesting example of dirigisme. Their state does not (nor claims to) depart from the capitalist mode of production, but it has departed enough from capitalism as-we-know-it due to the unusual power the government has over big business. So while the government has historically had troubles with corruption (which the CIA would exploit to accelerate assets into higher positions, pay-to-win IRL), on the other hand, we see institutional attacks against corrupt billionaires and selfish bosses which are unthinkable to most other capitalist states. Musk, Bezos or Zuckerburg would have to stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody before they maybe go to a special upscale jail or house arrest, while the PRC have given suspended death sentences for extreme financial crimes (like Liu Liange taking millions of dollars in bribes) and notoriously executed multiple billionaires (for murder convictions).

Now, whether that second example is a society that people want, that’s obviously a hotly debated topic, but I’d say objectively their system is working (in terms of stability and economic strength) and a modern alternative to our current system (their system is capable of rewarding societal values above self-service)

FWIW, furries have have been ‘a thing’ since at least 1980. (just trivia: I know you’re talking about trends in your area)

They all could’ve been sold and the money used to help poor people.

Nice fantasy. But no, that was never going to happen in real life.

Now there’s nothing.

Now there’s a clear message in international headlines, and one heard by those trying to profit using Tesla.

The point being that nothing is inherently wrong with making individualistic self serving choices except when there is disregard for others

Historically, individualism hasn’t been a good survival strategy. I agree that self-interest isn’t inherently wrong, although I believe much of the things we consider self-serving are ultimately only sane to do once our basic needs are met, and depending on where you are and who you are, those may be at risk soon. There’s a reason why people historically formed tribes and villages to survive, individualism is only possible when you have the privilege of an advanced enough society. The capitalist market system, in fact the market system altogether, couldn’t come into existence prior to civilization, where society was strong and safe enough that individual enrichment was a viable survival strategy.

This video makes the point I’m getting at more concretely. Can start at 15:55, when they begin talking about historical materialism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nPVkpWMH9k

(tagging parent commenter @Cryophilia@lemmy.world because this also addresses their reply about people’s inherent self-serving)

Hey OP, I just want to say from experience the reddit bashing usually dies down a bit after a quick spike of reddit refugees like we’re seeing now.

The earliest exoduses were socialist political communities banned from reddit (particularly /r/chapotraphouse who formed Hexbear, and /r/GenZedong who landed in Lemmygrad). Then, the most recent exodus is related to censorship related to Luigi Mangione, a US political issue, coinciding with a strong sudden re-emergence of global anti-American [government] sentiment due to diplomatic catastrophes with a range of former allies.

In fact, the founders cite reddit’s corporate nature and its pro-US-imperialist, racist stances as their motivation to create Lemmy: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/07-history-of-lemmy.html

So I’m not surprised at all that the default feed is covered in political topics, it’s always been a strong topic here and it’s just gotten stronger. But there’s probably enough activity now that one can filter it out and still have enough action to keep it fun.

Well there’s some lovely anti-imperialist coups going on in West Africa recently, here please read these 30 news articles about Burkino Fa

That’s true, and if we’re lucky, some of those 300,000 people can help make it happen.

I just think the “just start blasting” attitude I keep seeing from people is naive

That’s true, although I must be in different circles because I don’t see it much.

Def agree with the rest.