This tech needs years to reach practical terms.
here are some older examples:
2007: https://www.technologyreview.com/2007/01/22/226911/battery-breakthrough/
2009: https://research.ibm.com/publications/lithium-air-battery-promise-and-challenges
2012: https://www.technologyreview.com/2012/10/16/183258/a123-systems-files-for-bankruptcy/
tldr, how is this breakthrough different than than the other battery breakthroughs? I read some new battery that solves “the world’s massive energy storage needs.” about once or twice a year and so for not a single one had a noteworthy followup a year later.
at the end of the day, his only crime is being annoying. He didn’t kill someone, didn’t steal anything, etc. So 6months seems fair.
"I know for a fact that I’m not going to go to jail. Not one day in jail. I’m going to laugh my ass off when all these motherf***ers are saying I’m going for 30 years, 20 years, five years, 10 years. I’m not even going to do one day, bro. They’ll give me a fine and say, ‘Don’t come back to Korea.’ You’re the one that’s going to look so dumb when I don’t get any jailtime or anything. Bro, I’m going to laugh like a f**king villain.
amazing.
yes. both are good in their own. It’s definitely worth to both watch the movie, and also read the book.
centaur have human shoulders and neck and head. And horse body without neck&head
so the first one is right, except with human neck
iirc that detail they are refering to, didnt make it into the movie.
sorry for the snark, but
big companies are often incompetent and inefficient in a lot of ways
iirc his VP want to summon jesus via armageddon
We can invest in public transit or even public bike/scooter rentals without allowing free reign for a private company to make profits
can we though?
more users means, they should do much better than the ones with less users (assuming each user is worth the same/requires same infra).
at the worst case, a bigger org could just copy paste a smaller orgs system a couple times to get the exact same uptime, with same budget per user*. The benefit of bigger orgs is, that they can consolidate these separate system a big system that is more stable AND costs less. If this wasn’t true, we wouldn’t have big orgs in the first place**.
* yes, it is NOT the same budget for the users. You can’t JUST copy paste the system, you’d also need to think how you split it up. I know there are a million little things to nitpick here, but this can all be solved somewhat easily, and they wont change the overall argument.
** regulatory capture, lobbying, corruption and creating a monopoly could also be consider aspects of “consolidating into a bigger system”. This doesn’t mean why MS shouldn’t be able to be better, it just explains why they aren’t better.
I wouldn’t be surprised, it it turns out, when the most efficient way to turn lightning into electricity, was to redirect it into a boiler, instead of harvesting it directly
how does it compare to other distros on the chart?
e.g. i can imagine that many military people us RHEL (which already is on the appropriate place on the chart).
except for solar and wind, i guess. also the thingy where you catch electrons directly from nuclear decay.
vendors like Snapmaker
so far Snapmaker seems to have a good trackrecord, and has earned the trust of many, as their successful u1 kickstarter showed.
they promised to opensource large parts of their by end of next month. Lets see how that turns out https://support.snapmaker.com/hc/en-us/articles/33344279396759-Snapmaker-U1-FAQ#h_01K4VWF124M7HRBZEB4SS4EM09
if you underwear is not rated for 80°, then don’t cook it at 80°?
while researching I found, that apparently we had a potential real recent breakthrough though, which is actually used in a car https://electrek.co/2026/02/05/first-sodium-ion-battery-ev-debuts-game-changer/