They were actually carried by birds. See this documentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4_9kDO3q0w&t=44 /s
They were actually carried by birds. See this documentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4_9kDO3q0w&t=44 /s
Maybe an algorithm put it there due to relevance.
Not gonna happen. But if it does it will probably be like Youtube and Spotify so prepare to hear ads in your brain if you don’t have the premium subscription.
I ask that question and you failed to answer it twice. I’m interested in how they violate my privacy. Like, the mechanisms. To say Brave products are bad in one aspect therefore they are bad in all aspects is falacy of the composition.
I don’t know. That’s why I’m asking.
What is the issue exactly with their search engine?
It was indeed a 2.4 Ghz one.
So a system that relies on endless growth thought the utiization of finite resources is not sustainable? Who would have thought?
I’ll probably going to update to wired. It has all of the advanteges except portability. The only reason I got that wireless keyboard was that I needed something small, chaeap and portable.
Thanks. For what kind of specs I should be looking when byuing a wireless product? What key words I should be looking for?
But the Sanboxed Google play services, I would imagine is still closed sourced. Right? If true, just accounting for trying to minimize closed sorced software on device, Micro-g must be strictly better, in that one issue at least.
I think what I’ve heard (more or less) is that they are equally private but GrapheneOS is more secure. I don’t remember what the justification was though. I’m interested to see what replies your question gets.
I’ve always seen CalyxOS as the version that is the more user friendly (easier installation, better support. At least as of few years ago. Things migh have changed now.)
Personally what I question is the choice of GrapheneOS to use sanboxed Google play services rarher than the open source alternative micro-G. I can’t see how that’s better.
Ok thanks. I’ve been using CalyxOS for a while and l’m not caught up with “regular” Android. But if this features are so usefull why aren’t they merged to the AOSP (Android open source project)
It is on my phone on CalyxOS. I’m not sure about other operating systems. It could be that is not.I did’t expect so much difference in functiinality since Calyx is based on AOSP.
Indeed it is. Is this not typical?
I thought you could do that through the setting “Allow client to use VPNs” in Network & internet -> Hotspot and tethering settings
Still by the nature o these animals being bigger it is practicality easier to separate the different parts. With everithing else being equal. No matter how bad it is, it is going to be less than 100% of the initial shit ammount unlike with the bugs wich I’ll imagine are being crushed whole.
Thanks. But hypothetically even in that scenario if I’m offline and I want to turn VPN on, first I need toconnect to internet and then trought that initial connection communicate with the vpn server to turn VPan on. Right? So I’ll still be volnurable for a moment especially if a lot of app are programmed to sent data onlne the moment they find internet access.
Conservation of area is not a law of nature.