The US have been doing that for a long time. Think of the DMCA or even the first opium conference (1910). Trump is just loudmouthedly open about it instead of talking between the lies. And, of course, everyone in his right mind hates him.

Sure sounds better than “shatheistic” - but you better don’t think about the fact that “gnostic” is the direct opposite of “agnostic” which makes the pun somewhat ambiguous.

Whatever. I don’t think philosemitism is really too extreme a position for a memorial site on the ground of a former extinction camp. They’re certainly not representing a neutral position.

The crook is “issuing sanctions” against the law. Where have the “western values” gone to?

I’d use it all the ways.

40 cents rot? Prices in the US are pretty steep, nowadays, it seems.

You’re lucky I’m getting stared at through my webcam by a Gor…

Can confirm the fridge part. I’ve got an ice box from the 1960s (“Made in West Germany”), inherited from my grandma that has been running flawlessly since then. I had an energy meter stuck to it some time ago, it’s using less kWh than our brand new, low energy certified fridge.

Vikings living up to their reputation. 😁

Yes. I think we’re missing each other pinpointing details while meaning the same. Every browser has it’s defaut or “standard” style, nowadays even adapting to the system theme and trying to guess if to use day or night settings etc. Nevertheless it won’t break lines in a reasonable way, won’t deal with footnotes in an acceptable way and either break the layout of pure text pages or the layout of illustrated pages. HTML5 makes these specific things somewhat better as it allows realtively advanced document structure but nevertheless, a few lines of CSS to reflect at least the prinipial character of the document are unlikely to hurt anyone in a worse way than a one-style-fits-all layout for everything will hurt tha vast majority.

That’s not even convincing pedantery. Nobody would assune that a browser’s standard style might be an RFC, IETF- or in any way official standard,

I don’t think. You can’t prove I do! Leave me alone. You’re one of them! I knew it all the time.

Yes , I can read books. I even read one or two of the 1200 around me. Those with the fuckpics and some of the funnier ones, like “Phänomenologie des Geistes” by Hegel. I wouldn’t have if they had been layouted using browser standards.

ASCII?! Useless, modern witchcraft! Devils work! Give me CCITT-1 or give me death!

Oh, come on. You really want some at least readable output. Things like image borders, consistently positioned images/diagrams, line breaks and page borders. Some whitespace and indentations, too. You just can’t read a couple of pages full of unformatted raw text without massive eye fatigue. I’m all for dumping JS and excessive frameworks, I’d prefer well-formed XHTML over any of that clients-side scripted crap, but totally rejecting CSS is pointless zealotry.

CSS on the other hand is quite essential to separate layout from content. Which is a good thing, so I can’t really think of a reason for a “no-CSS” rule. Specifically if you can use inline styles as well but in a way more messy way.

But not enough fingers for AI-slop. Fingers! Father! Give me fingers!

The “P” stands for “U” of course.

O the voices told me about it

Boring. 1999 called, they want their good, old Linux rant back. Seriously, I have heard every sentence of that before. Ten times and I have argued against all of it just as many times. Respect to everyone who still does but I have come to the conlusion that it’s just waste of time. Whenever I’m hearing these meticulous lists of complaints I know they’re not written by anyone who looks for solutions but just loves to complain and tell other people how stupid they are. That’s a lot more satisfying than feeling technically incompetent. You could just restart your system and be a happy Microslave ever after. There’s no need to bring down reasonable people who have kernels to compile and cryptic configuration files to edit on theiir green on black Tectronix terminals. Hahaha. Ha. Ha.