Wigners_friend

In this context it means they want to kill Palestinians liberally.

It’s just what power means to someone like him. He can say what he wants and everyone has to accept it. You have no meaningful ability to hold him to account for the lie. That’s power.

Bayesian yacht sank because of improper posterior weighting.

Right, but that’s just for present compute capacity in the most optimistic scenario. Neglecting anything realistic, and the fact that starlink cooling isn’t actually sufficient (the sattelites have low power downtime to cool). On top of that the GPUs still die faster than the sattelites and you can’t just walk over and replace them in the rack. Let alone the end of ground-based astronomy or light pollution.

Starlink satellites carry antennae. That’s all they are. Not serious computational equipment.

Edit: so his power argument is mostly fine. Different components do dissipate different amounts of heat at the same power. Antennae will not run as hot as GPUs, the fact they radiate power by design helps here. However, even if you could use all a v2 satellite’s power generation for compute, you need 35 sattelites per MW of compute. So at the lowest estimate 35000 for a GW data centre. For 2024 data centre capacity (47 GW computed from 415 TWh used) you need around 1.6 million sattelites. Now you need to network a vast cloud to get reasonable inter GPU performance.

The required orbit would probably mean a whole strip of earth gets insane light pollution, due to the reflectivity of so many sattelites jammed into the narrow orbit. Note that each satellite is about as bright as a star visible to the naked eye.

Edit edit: The lifetime of a data centre GPU is around 1-2 years for serious uptime. The sattelites are meant to have a 5 year lifetime.

Unfortunately not for most physics journals. Initial can be a PDF, but subsequent needs latex sources.

I love typst but I don’t use it. Academic journal templates are all latex, so I can’t use it for my primary use case.

So they found something LLMs can actually do, and predictably it’s incredibly evil.

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/how-to-stop-worrying-and-learn-to

He cites Richard Lynn as an authority (on racial IQ stuff). Case closed.

No the author.

Is there are a non-nazi source?

Not really. The clocks aren’t being stopped in SR, they differ because there is no common notion of simultaneity. Both observers here use the same reference frame. They just don’t always run their clocks. Your analogy requires the external observer to disagree on the duration of the process while only including when it is running.

This comment is perfect. Science can only now serve the useless musk-o-vite elite. Otherwise, it can’t be funded.

Lol, he doesn’t use his health beliefs. That’s just for peasants. He has real health problems, those that don’t result from laziness.

Neurotypical people barely think. They conduct rituals.

Any metric will become the goal itself. It always has. In academia, citations became the metric and now we use them to determine good science, without having to actually think. I think it’s a flaw built into the neurotypical (and lots of neurodivergent types too).

Edit: in fact, metrics are the cancer that eats democracies. Anything can be justified by “line go up”.

including “indigo”. Seriously? I am colourblind, even I know that’s bullshit.

Don’t worry about, super magic AGI will solve all problems. Sam Altman said so.

Underrated comment. However, it’s never lupus.