Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 138 Posts
  • 130 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle



  • This was a decent explainer. In a nutshell…

    • There are four categories of trade barriers in Canada: natural barriers such as geography, prohibitive barriers such as restrictions on the sale of alcohol, technical barriers such as vehicle weight standards and regulatory barriers such as licensing and paperwork requirements.

    • The 2017 CFTA was intended to cut down on some of these barriers, but all provinces and territories negotiated exemptions for various reasons, ranging from different safety regulations across provinces, to different language requirements, to industry protectionism.

    It’s not clear right now which barriers the feds can unilaterally eliminate (and whether we agree with all of them), but I guess we’ll find out within the next week or so.






























  • More of a set of bullet points than an actual “plan.”

    Financial incentives, not penalties, to help consumers afford things like more energy efficient appliances, electric cars, and better home insulation.

    Great - details, please. What kind of incentives, and at what stage of the buying process will they be applied?

    Canada’s biggest emitters will contribute their fair share

    Does this mean the existing carbon tax on industry will remain in place, or…something else?

    Investments towards energy efficient buildings, electrified transportation, and more.

    Meaninglessly vague without details.

    Ensuring fairness for Canadian industries on the global stage, and better integrate with allies in the fight against climate change.

    Word salad.



  • She did note that there are legitimate concerns about some parliamentarians potentially having problematic relationships with foreign officials, exercising poor judgment, behaving naively and perhaps displaying questionable ethics.

    “But I did not see evidence of parliamentarians conspiring with foreign states against Canada,” the report concludes.

    “While some conduct may be concerning, I did not see evidence of ‘traitors’ in Parliament.”

    This is encouraging, but there needs to be a mechanism for these “problematic relationships” to be brought out into the public sphere (without it becoming a witch hunt).