That’s what I don’t get about this. The point is either to get out of paying or at least make it very difficult. At the same time the cost to Disney as a company with all the bad press and fall out from doing this would be orders of magnitude greater than simply paying the widower compensation. Who signed off on it? The idea that a lawyer can do what ever it takes to win a case while simultaneously destroying the company they work for seems dumb as shit from a purely financial point of view.

What about sideways?

It’s more different than better, and by different I mean better

Bread lick-gar.

Bread licka

Left is in common sense units, right is in intelligence units. There is no “freedom” (to be ignorant) units though no.

Also sorry for the burn but it is a deserving burn at least.

Temperature of the body

That’s ridiculous, he’s obviously Jesus Christ.

That not helpful to the narrative that Hamas who are made up of Palestinians and supported by Palestinian people are pure and innocent

Snopes says this

What’s True Tobacco enemas were a real and at one time popular medical practice thought to have been able to revive people who had drowned or were otherwise catastrophically ill. What’s False However, the phrase “blow smoke up your ass” appears to have its origins more recently, in the 1960s, and there is no evidence linking it to the long-ago practice of tobacco enemas.

https://www.historyextra.com/period/first-world-war/what-is-the-origin-of-the-phrase-to-blow-smoke-up-someones-arse/

A criminal is basically someone who wronged or oppressed someone else. I wouldn’t consider them vulnerable. Still a shitty way to treat prisoners

Get peasants to ask the fed? When has the fed ever given a shit about what peasants say

How very trump of him

Good chance he’s full of shit and what really happened was more criminal so he had too come up with an even more batshit story to get himself out of it

I knew I should have added the /s

No. If you read the thread this is in reference to people who attempt to tie their own race with religion. Eg Jewish people who believe an anti Zionist statement is anti Jewish or a criticism of parts of the Koran is somehow an attack on Arab people

And with right to try now there is?

I’m unfamiliar with the details of these programs. I thought the point of right to try was if you were going to die anyway, being allowed to try an experimental treatment as long as you had exhausted all other options where as the existing program (assuming EAP) still prevented people accessing some experimental treatments?

I thought this was a good thing trump did

It’s a lie. Just like being anti Zionist is racist. It’s not. Can happily critisize problematic teachings of religious doctrines while having zero problems with a person of that race who also disagrees with the doctrine.