This kind of work I find very important when talking about AI adoption.

I’ve been generating (the boring) parts of work documents via AI, and even though I put a lot of thought into my prompts and I reviewed and adjusted the output each time, I kept wondering constantly if people would notice the AI parts, and if that made me look either more efficient and ‘complete’ (we are talking about some template document where some parts seem to be designed to be repetitive), or lazy and disrespectful. Because it’s for sure that my own trust in content and a person drops when I notice auto-generated parts, which triggers that I use AI in turn, and I ask it to summarise all that verbose AI generated content. I’m not sure that’s how decoder-encoders are meant to work :)

Thank you.

Has anyone actually tried representing dinosaurs like fluffy (or very feathery) animals?

And this is what happens when the measure becomes the target

2!!!

Now that we have a club confirmed, we should have club meetings! Though I see how that may not work out…

This and the chicken presentation are my favourite pieces of academic work https://youtu.be/yL_-1d9OSdk

A cardboard box (and put something in it so the parents won’t look at you funny)

I’ve spent some time reading the Wikipedia article looking for the relevant part, I guess I was 10 mins early (didn’t get the chance to see your comment before that). Here’s the (probably) corresponding video, the first video result when searching for the freestyle javelin technique, in case it helps anyone: https://youtu.be/52rvqtiBoow?si=RiLjhJG2ttv-0s1W

I don’t know why this was also my exact same first thought

Next to upvoting, I’m just writing this to potentially get your comment ranked higher for this post.

I may be missing the point, but why not instead list names in whatever order, but clarify who contributed what.

I’m kind of waiting for the pteranodon to appear there…