By the way Doordash always worked like that
It really sucks when that happens, but at least DoorDash and Uber tell you that it’s being delivered to someone else first.
What I really hate, is when they are working 2 different apps, have my food, and then go in the exact opposite direction of my home to do the other apps delivery first, and neither service cares as long as it’s delivered to you by the latest expected time.
Agreed. That’s why I left my comment. I don’t like editorializing the titles from the news sites.
Upper Management: WTF are they complaining about, we don’t promise hot food or on time delivery on our website.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doordash-pizza-hut-minimum-wage-hikes-california-new-york-city/
Pizza Hut is laying off more than 1,200 delivery drivers in California ahead of the state’s nearly 30% increase in its minimum wage, to $20 an hour from $16. PacPizza, operating as Pizza Hut, and Southern California Pizza Co. — another Pizza Hut franchise, both gave notice of layoffs impacting workers in cities throughout the state, Business Insider reported, citing notices filed with the state.
That would address the cold food issue maybe, but it wouldn’t fix the delay in delivery issue as they wait on starting the pizza so they batch better.
It doesn’t seem like AI is actually the problem here, as any new tech system could have given that kind of visibility to the DoorDash drivers and resulted in this problem, but either way, it’s an interesting fail, where a maybe good idea, falls apart because of human behaviour.
The judge told them they don’t think it will succeed because the statute of limitations is a finding of fact. The only way it can continue is if they somehow convince the appeals court it hadn’t passed, and then it’d probably mean a whole new trial since they didn’t rule on the rest of the case?
“There’s a substantial amount of evidence to support the jury’s finding, which is why I was prepared to dismiss on the spot,” U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said.
It feels like such a waste of time and money to have spent so much time figuring out the answer to the statute question while having the whole trial. If they simply could have short circuited the proceedings and only focused on this to start, got an answer to this, and then continued if necessary it would have been so much easier on everyone. It doesn’t take 11 days to answer this question.
The judge almost dismissed it outright because of this.
“There’s a substantial amount of evidence to support the jury’s finding, which is why I was prepared to dismiss on the spot,” U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said.
The year is 2050, massive petawatt scale ocean based data centres are warming the ocean in their immediate vicinity, opening up new breeding grounds for a new killer algae. The algae once unable to grow in regular ocean tempatures thrives in this new ecosystem, and once it matures is able to leave the warmer waters and destroys other marine life it comes into contact with.
This destruction of life in the ocean reverberates around the world as food supply dwindles and hundreds of millions of people begin to starve.
A computer was anyway. These services arent necessarily reading our messages personally, but the algorithms parse them for ad placements or whatever, and it probably got flagged as being unreadable.
Edit: Some services that arent intending to be secure chat might not like the idea of encrypted content on their system either. What is it? What are they now harboring which wasn’t their intent at all? Like if you made a lemmy community and only had encrypted messages on it, a mod from the server might have something to say about it.
Pretty sure I read stories in the past of Google or someone like them banning people who were sending pre encrypted messages over one of their chat services.
I’m sure there are people rich enough to do this too
I wont build my multi million dollar mansion here thats going to staff 8 full time people unless you waive my property taxes for 2 decades.
Jesus. It probably does happen. 😭
The citizens often dont eat anything, as its usually just delayed property taxes or other similar things. Im sure thats not always the case though and maybe they are sometimes given money.
The state then gets all the income taxes and jobs from building it.
But ya, without legislating things like this away it wont stop.
Edit: oh I misread part of what you said, you meant the supporting infrastructure like if the state paid for a new substation. Im sure that does happen, that would negate the income taxes for awhile. They should make the businesses pay for that, and let them recoup that through the tax benefits. Don’t take money from the tax payers to help them out.
Because unless every single state does it, they’ll go to the one that doesn’t.
The states are still going to make a lot of money off this, its just delayed by 7 years by their duration.
Would you rather get money in 7 years when they expire and increased income taxes from building it/staffing it or nothing?
This is for anything, not just data centers. States will always fight to get the investment.
What a beautiful graph!
Definitely it can be a lot. It could even be the difference between profitable or not for some companies.
Do the soldiers get more than an apology and the reprimand removed from their record? Is it even removed from their official record in a way it truly is never seen again? Seems like a soldier causing up a stir like this goes on a permanent list of trouble makers.
Income from Canada. It’s not 63% of their income.
How does AI impact the door dash driver deciding not to deliver a pizza that’s ready because they can see what future orders are about to be ready?