I’ve seen dozen of the same core “Gamification of real world activities”.

What makes this one different from the rest?

Vegans are not a monolith. Some do, some don’t. The decision generally comes down to their motivations & their education level.

Since ethical honey sourcing is actively good for both bees and local ecosystem, many vegans will consume ethically sourced honey. As opposed to meat where even the most ethical forms still involve the death of an animal.

Besides that many vegans view it as their ‘cheat’ option to curb their cravings. But also, there is very little reason to consume honey vs raw sugar, the flavor is similar especially once mixed into other food items. So some cut it simply because it is easy to cut.

99.99% of all MF’s that say some shit like “Yeah I got bad grades, but if they tested critical thinking then I would have cum loud or whatever”

Yeah ok brother. You couldn’t critically think your way through a 3 page structured essay but I’m sure you were just holding back.

You have to know the rules, why they exist, and what breaking them implies.

If you are in a class designed to teach the rules, it doesn’t even matter if you already did all 3 steps. You’ll fail the class because the class is testing if you CAN follow the rules.

The two being conflated c o n s t a n t l y pisses me off

I get it’s fun to taunt Trump but booooooo for shaming platonic compliments.

Immediately? No

Often? Via additional details like them being drawn sexually? Yes

Morally wrong AND sexually unappealing*, I can’t imagine why it doesn’t exist

I have absolutely 100% seen the “she’s a 1000 year old witch coincidentally drawn as a child” unironically in many nsfw forums. Like it’s not hard to find, there is evidence of it on Reddit even let alone sites dedicated to the subject or with worse moderation policies.

It’s out there. Denying it’s existence just reveals your own ignorance on the subject.

Twitter users when you say you hate the Democrats.

“Welcome klansmen!”

deleted by creator

As a meme, this is a good article.

As a genuine discussion on the definition of Robot, this is stupid af.

FWIW - literally all things are social constructs if your definition of social construct is “a category of things that includes/excludes things based on our perception & interaction with it”

I don’t know the sentiment behind your comment but my point is it’s stupid to argue about Americentrism on a Americentric platform.

Like it’s fine if you don’t want to see that content but go to a different platform rather than whine about it. It’s not the bakeries fault you arrived wanting to buy a car.

I’m not sure if this is a “It’s called X guys” comment or a “That pile of dogshit is still online?” comment. And my upvote/downvote depends on that

Agree on the chatbot thing but to be honest, it was like that way before LLMs.

There was a full decade where they would just keyword match you to different chat flowcharts.

I’ve got some bad news for you about where the majority of fediverse users are based.

Woosh buy also dude has a point

A faceless banbot caught you in their word filter?

It’s death for you.

deleted by creator

The fundamentals get worse and worse the closer you look.

Like for example, so much of their opex is filed under capex. Graphic cards & related assets degrade over time but are often listed as one time purchases, compute time is often evaluated as one time expenses but the models need to be retrained to improve over time, etc.