Gunman Chronicles is unironically great. Granted, I love games with ludicrous numbers of weapons, but the fact that the weapons have a bazillion firing modes is fun.

I’m pretty sure it’s AI generated; which is really weird because I’m pretty sure there are plenty of 50’s era images featuring a smiling woman in the kitchen.

Those are massive raccoons. Holy fuck.

This was not on my 2024 bingo card, what the fuck.

Yes! I’ve been trying to figure out what the fuck the difference is for a long time but for some reason that explanation kept eluding me; I don’t mind being called “a female [blank]”, but just being called “a female” bothers me. But that’s it right there, it’s when it’s used as a noun.

Hey, uh, don’t refer to male humans as “men” and then female humans as “females” like that. It’s kinda dehumanizing.

Like, I get calling men, “males” and women “females”, because I’ll do that sometimes (I claim fur-brain as my defense, because calling anthro characters “man” or “woman” is weird); but try not to do the thing where you say “men” then “females” as if we’re a complete different species. That’s… just… not appropriate in a normal context.

The joke has been around a while, so they probably have made the same joke.

We killed God. And we’d do it again if given the chance.

Probably dead. On the other hand, it’d be easier to tell who I’m safe around.

Isn’t that a good thing? You shouldn’t feel comfortable casually dropping the hammer on a gun. You should be on alert and questioning whether or not you got all the bullets out before you released the hammer.

Sooooo… Mirror cells can’t be latched onto by normal cells. Why would mirror cells be able to latch onto normal cells? This seems like fear mongering because, logically speaking, if A can’t attach to B, then B can’t attach to A. I suppose you could program mirror cells to attack normal cells via indirect means (creating toxins that kill normal cells), but it seems like they’d struggle to fulfill their purpose because the article makes it sound like their “diet” is also mirrored.

The car analogy is one of my favorite analogies to use when explaining trans stuff to people. It doesn’t get too deep into the dysphoria part, but it helps explain the goals.

Honestly, that kinda sounds like the average American diner experience. Not bad, not good, just okay. Granted, a small hole-in-the-wall or independent diner that’s been around forever will almost certainly be better; but when it comes to your average American diner (like IHOP, Denny’s, etc) that sounds about right.

Have you tried the original doctor who? I enjoyed those way more than nu-who; especially the capaldi stuff (which, as much as I liked the actor, the story arcs were just kinda bleh imo). I stopped watching after capaldi regenerated. Out of the nu-who though, I’d say (original) David Tennant/Christopher Eccleston > Matt Smith > capaldi ??? Other nu-whos.

What if the killer was the Costco founder? He told the United Healthcare CEO the same thing and then followed through.

Do I need the sandwich too? If so I’ll give him half (if he asks for it, otherwise I’ll just sit there and eat the whole thing while missing social cues like a dumbass).

Will I need the sandwich in the near future? If so, then again, I’ll give him half.

Did I just eat a meal and I don’t need the sandwich now nor in the immidate future? By all means, eat!

My current conspiracy theory is that he is gonna get assassinated by the “”“far left”“” (aka totally not the Republican party), which will trigger a full fascist takeover. He’s too old for me to imagine him being able to make it through a full second term, and too unpredictable for Republican politicians to actually want him to be around; so the ideal situation would be to have him publicly assassinated and use that to drum up support for massive surveillance and restrictions on personal freedom.

Remy literally has a flesh mech and army of rats working for him by the end of the movie. Wtf are you smoking, lol?

Maybe, depends on how kinky they are. I mean, humans engage in master/pet relationships as a lifestyle and not just a bedroom kink.

And no, I’m not convinced that +10,000yrs of extra development would automatically make them view a human as being like an animal. Would you really consider ancient Mesopotamians to be significantly less intelligent than modern humans?