You can submit just about anything as evidence in court. So the bar to call something evidence is really low. Not sure why that’s the hill you want to die on when there are far better ones.
And you know I am not suggesting anything is uniform. But I was referring to an election result. So it’s just the percent that matters in the end.
Ahhh the manuals… and the mail order hint guides. Those were the days.
Not yet, but I am old enough… lol
Since I know you love this stuff… Take a group of 100 people. And ask them to pick A or B. 75% of them choose A. If you then pick a radom subset, the odds are that more than half picked A. Of course there exist subsets that didn’t. But that is just how percentages work. That would be evidence, but not proof. Because odds are the subset would have picked A over B, but it isn’t proof that the subset did. So. There is no particular reason to think that the subset of rural voters who have no ups and such are exceptionally different from all rural voters as a whole. They may be, but odds are they aren’t. Thus evidence, and not proof. Your implication is that rural voters who don’t have ups and such service voted more for Harris than Trump? He didn’t run on abolishing the usps. So why would that aspect make a difference? In general, rural voters are the ones that will be hurt most by trumps policies, yet per the link, they voted for him. See what I did there. I gave you the next thing to pivot to.
If it’s on a cd, it ain’t old yet.
You mistake evidence with ironclad proof. They are not the same.
They are different, but one is a subset of the other.
That’s why you belong on reddit.
Maybe they all wanted his autograph too. I wonder who thier health insurance provider is…
Great and all. But can we get something below a state of emergency. Everything seems to trigger one of those these days. It kinda loses it’s meaning when overused.
And in the mean time?
Take your pointless comments back to reddit where they belong.
I have read enough of your comments to know that you know the difference between overwhelming and all.
You must be high. I didn’t provide any evidence. I just gave an opinion paired with a comment about obvious hypocrisy.
I literally said that. The people in rural areas overwhelmingly voted for this. It’s their will. They don’t like programs that only benefit specific groups like the poor or disabled. Rural is just another group right.
Meh. The usps delivers mostly junk mail. Occasionally they deliver a bill. The packages they deliver could be covered by others. There will be gaps in rural areas of course. But those are the people who steadfastly vote for smaller government. So they most be okay with it. I say, let it go. Junk mail will cease because a private business would have to charge to much. Bills and such would go electronic… like the denial letter from anthem that they rufused to tell me the contents of. That all sounds good to me.
So this looks like a case of local officials letting these people out of jail and to house arrest when clearly they shouldn’t be. It’s the same as some welfare recipients abuse the system, but should we end welfare for all. No. These two slipped through. But plenty more who deserved the pardon got it.
Right. Eating is addictive. Drinking of course. And for a lot of people so is running, lol.
Just a witty come back? Nothing more.