I’ve heard it makes a good toilet paper substitute
Lytia
- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
I’m sure this could only end well…
https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/869
I’m sure this could only end well…
https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/869
It’s opt-in.
Yeah, the part that makes you money is. Still have to manually disable all of the popups and icons begging you to use it.
You just described every single internet service that you’re not actively paying for.
Difference is those sites don’t necessarily advertise themselves as “privacy respecting”
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Is DeleteMe.org real? Looks too good to not be a data stealing scam.
97·24 days agoReject Convience does privacy policy reading streams, and has a pretty hard stance on no TLDRs. If you don’t have time to watch it, save it for later. Better that than to trust a random person’s 5 word TLDR.
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Is DeleteMe.org real? Looks too good to not be a data stealing scam.
91·24 days agoInvidious link because icky YouTube: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=iX3JT6q3AxA
We need more people like that in the world
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Cities Panic Over Having to Release Mass Surveillance Recordings
1391·2 months ago“You mean we have to let the public use the services they’re paying for? Wtf!”
This feels relatively tame compared to everything else that godforsaken platform has done in the past few months.
No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit. No problem! I can just kill the process in the…shit.
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Someone Snuck Into a Cellebrite Microsoft Teams Call and Leaked Phone Unlocking Details
3·2 months agoThat still won’t keep the phone up to date, as you have to decrypt the device for it to update.
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Someone Snuck Into a Cellebrite Microsoft Teams Call and Leaked Phone Unlocking Details
11·2 months agoMost (older and lower end) phones don’t do encryption in the first place, so BFU becomes barely better than an unlocked phone.
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Someone Snuck Into a Cellebrite Microsoft Teams Call and Leaked Phone Unlocking Details
16·2 months agoAssuming you’re on GrapheneOS: https://grapheneos.org/features#auto-reboot
I don’t think most other OEMs have an auto reboot feature
Lytia @lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Someone Snuck Into a Cellebrite Microsoft Teams Call and Leaked Phone Unlocking Details
16·2 months agoAfaik, it only disables biometrics. BFU means the entire phone (should be) encrypted. You can test this by playing media and then pressing the lockdown button. If the media continues playing, it’s not encrypted.
If you can’t shut your phone down for whatever reason, disabling biometrics would be the second best option (assuming police cannot force you to reveal your password).
I think you need to learn how cookies work. In this case it was probably a tracker appended to the link (the stuff after the question mark). If it was a cookie, they would be able to resubmit by starting a new browsing session.
P.S. why the þ’s? I see you everywhere but keep forgetting to ask.
This kind of mindset is what make the privacy community seem like outcasts. Yes, pedophiles and other criminals would benefit from complete anonymity, but that does not mean we should draw the line at how anonymous someone gets to be because “only pedos operate at that level”.




If you’re using a third-party email client, but using a gmail email address, then PGP would stop Google from reading your emails (assuming the private keys aren’t compromised).
If you’re using their email client, then nothing stops them from decrypting your emails if they really wanted to. IIRC, gmail doesn’t natively support PGP anyways though, so you’d have to use a third-party client.