I will never downvote you, but I will fight you

  • 0 Posts
  • 657 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 24th, 2024

help-circle

  • Yeah I see it but thats not what the problem is. The author isnt saying “ai’s points of contrast arent relevant or helpful” its calling out the construction itself. The author complains about the ineffective writing of ai, and then names the wrong problem. Its like saying "the problem with ai writing is ai keeps usimg the word “the”. No that isnt the problem! There are problems and that isnt the one. It isnt a stylistic quirk, its the way the quirk is used that stands out, just like you said.

    But actually I’m just having a laugh trying to fit in as many “its not x, its y” comments as I can. I’m all about criticizing ai but theres so much to actually criticize and this misses the mark



  • Yeah he was one of the orbiting intellectuals I don’t actually think he abused any kids. I heard on a podcast he got “kicked off the island” at some point even for pushing back on Epstein’s eugenicism. But people clearly knew what Epstein was, esp after his conviction. I’m sure for Pinker it was all just part of the job of being a public intellectual and representative of his university, who Epstein was a large contributor.

    But this is the guy who has written books about how the world is the best that it has ever been, as a way to cover for the few who get rich off of the suffering of the masses. He’s a middle intellectual who circumstances brought in close proximity to supreme evil, but never pulled his head out of hid own ass to notice












  • Juice@midwest.social
    cake
    toScience Memes@mander.xyzNo More Neutral ⚛
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is way too common to confuse the abstractions we use to understand reality with reality itself. Like the scientists who work with this stuff are really consistent in keeping the two separated, but the moment a theory gets in the hands of a journalist or god forbid a politician, it starts wreaking havok


  • It isnt moral bankruptcy, it is systematic. The capitalist who produces profit stays in business, the capitalist who does not goes bankrupt. It isnt morals of individuals, the dehumanization of the poor by the rich is a symptom of a system that prioritizes profits over humanity.

    Capitalism is, among other things, a system of forced competition.

    I’m glad to hear you are on the right side of it. But in order to be effective we have to name the actual problems. I am above all a humanist, and certainly the capitalist class contains some vile and hateful individuals. That is more clear now than ever before. But we are not made rich or poor by our morality; our morality comes from the conditions that dictate whether we are rich or poor.

    Even individualism is structural.