I guess it would technically count as cooking, yes. I call it the bare minimum.

I wonder if those two are correlated as I spend no time thinking about neither. I only eat so that I don’t die.

Well, all I’m going to say is that I’ve been on a few hikes with my ex and it wasn’t me complaining the whole trip.

It won’t. The day it seems to have disappeared is when it’s finally been perfected to be indistinguishable from a human.

Feel Good Inc. by Gorillaz

I’ve dealt with them in the past by carrying the plant into a tiny room and spraying the air with raid (not directly onto the plant) This needs to be repeated few times every 3 days or so to kill the entire population. Predatory mites should work as well but I’ve personally not had success with them

They came up with a system that turns outrage into cash and they’re literally printing money right now.

This is only marginally more practical and economical than drilling and refining your own oil.

Your own parents were in the exact same situation. And their parents. And theirs…

Oil prices skyrocketed during the Russian invasion of Ukraine as well. Markets react to world events. Shocking.

I don’t worry about it - I’m playing the long game.

Leave it to Lemmy to politicize Chuck Norris’ death.

You still need to know where to point that spy satellite’s camera at. If you take picture that covers hundreds of square kilometers then you don’t have enough resolution to spot the ship but you can’t zoom in much either because you don’t know where to zoom.

It’s different with buildings because you know where they are.

As long as they weren’t taking part in illegal street racing.

“We” as in the hivemind that is Lemmy userbase?

No… but is that a KONE branded security screw for an elevator?

Edit: Yes it is, here’s the tool for it. Interesting.

The case for banning simulated CSAM produced with GenAI is that if the training data contains actual CSAM then it would be directly contributing to real children being hurt. Obviously generating those pictures doesn’t further cause physical harm to anyone but someone has to already have been harmed in the past for that training data to exist in the first place.

This however is not true with cartoons for example nor does it apply to sex dolls either.

Not a single person here is advocating for having sex with kids.

I don’t know how to objectively answer a subjective question.

Are you seriously going to dodge every single hole people have poked in your flawed reasoning by redirecting attention to the person themselves - questioning their moral purity or hidden motives? Because that’s literally all you’ve done here so far.

Pedophilia doesn’t describe behaviour but attraction. If a rapist is not exlusively attracted to children then they’re by definition not a pedophile. I’m well aware that in everyday language that word is used interchangeably with child molester but those terms are not synonymous.