That’s…good?

Removed by mod

Ah yes, Shark Boy.

Ah, gotcha. Going forward I’ll refrain from joking about a different perspective, even if I actually fully agree with the original post. This place rules.

I do, not monthly but enough to say that my own anecdotal experience would agree with yours and this article’s perspective. That doesn’t stop me from taking a jokingly objective stance. First comment I made was just the reverse angle of the same data set.

I mean with the way the data is presented it definitely is agreeable that the rise in complaints is directly tied to the quality/performance of the flight industry.

But, on principle alone I refuse to openly accept correlation as a causation for two data sets, and always leave room for expansion and more dots to connect. Without that in play, it’s easy to convince anyone that all spurious correlations have a cause/effect relationship.

I thought it was funny and I stand firmly by that.

Oh…to be honest I think I read the prompt backwards. As a rule of thumb, anecdotes should always be taken with a grain of salt when presented with contradictory empirical evidence.

Totally unjustified, what did our drones ever do to them?..😬

Alternate title; Judging from the level of air-line complaints, people are getting bitchier.

Empirical VS anecdotal evidence.