

AI as it stands is a symbol of Capitalism and the problems it embodies.
I know and agree.
I’m only saying that promoting that symbol is damaging in other ways, such as to the sciences.
Some people may be expressing an opinion with that type of nuance (and I do agree with it) but, what appears to be the large majority of social media users on this topic don’t make that distinction and those people attack the sciences/non-LLM uses of the technology.
Yes, overuse of local water and power supplies is damaging, the replacement of workers is causing all kinds of economic issues, the ability for AI to enable mass surveilance and authoritarians is an urgent problem that needs to be addressed AND ALSO the people trying to fight against it are causing collateral damage to other important aspects of society, an example being that it’s making ML/AI a less popular major which will result in less researchers/slower advancement.
It’s important to point out that there have been several advances in AI that have significantly reduced the computation requirements. So, whatever the demand for AI will ultimately be, it will require an order of magnitude less datacenters because of this kind of research.
The source of the problems here are the people making the decision to deploy the technology in this way and their outsized influence on the government that should be regulating their actions.
AI is just the current topic. Outsourcing was another huge topic in the Clinton era. After that we had the post-crash bailout and the mass acquisition of housing by large capital funds in order to control the rental/real estate markets.
All of these things caused massive economic issues for the vast majority of people and were entirely done because the people that benefitted were able to influence the government and prevent their regulation.
This isn’t an AI problem. It’s a power, influence and corruption problem. AI’s destructive deployment is just the current symptom.









Yes, that is true.
But the source of murders is always a person, not the tool.
Just to be clear, I’m not making some kind of anti-gun control argument. I’m just explaining why that metaphor is flawed.
The problem at a murder scene isn’t the gun, it’s the person who used it. Nobody is mad at the gun, or worried that it will suddenly murder again.
Much like here. The problem isn’t AI, the problem is the people who are choosing to deploy AI in this way.
It’s the people