• 2 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle



  • Single GPU with scripts that run before and after the VM is active to unload the GPU driver modules from the kernel.

    I think this was my starting point and I had to do just a few small tweaks to get it right for my setup - i.e. unload and reload the precise set of kernel modules that block GPU passthrough on my machine.

    https://gitlab.com/Karuri/vfio

    At this point from a user experience p.o.v it’s not much different to dual booting, just with a different boot sequence. The main advantage though is that I can have the Windows OS on a small virtual harddrive for ease of backup/clone/restore and have game installs on a dedicated NVME that doesn’t need backing up


  • FBJimmy@lemmus.orgtoLinux@lemmy.mlSwitching back to Windows. For now.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been 100% linux for my daily home computing for over a year now… With one exception… To be honest I didn’t even try particularly hard to make gaming work under Linux.

    Instead I have a Windows VM - setup with full passthrough access to my GPU and it’s own NVME - just for Windows gaming. To my mind now it’s in the same category as running console emulation.

    As soon as I click shutdown in windows, it pops me straight back into my Linux desktop.






  • FBJimmy@lemmus.orgtoScience Memes@mander.xyzRecognize the mother of Wifi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Great to recognise this invention.

    I was surprised by the choice of ‘Mother of Wi-Fi’ though - Wi-Fi hasn’t used ‘frequency hopping’ as such since 802.11b was released back in 1999 - so very few people will have ever used frequency-hopping Wi-Fi.

    GPS only uses it in some extreme cases I think, but I’m not an expert.

    However, Bluetooth absolutely does depend on it to function in most situations, so ‘Mother of Bluetooth’ might have been more appropriate.










  • I agree it’s good that the article is not hyping up the idea that the world will now definitely be saved by fusion and so we can all therefore go on consuming all the energy we want.

    There are still some sloppy things about the article that disappoint me though…

    1. They seem to be implying that 500 TW is obviously much larger than 2.1 MJ… but without knowing how long the 500 TW is required for, this comparison is meaningless.

    2. They imply that using more power than available from the grid is infeasible, but it evidently isn’t as they’ve done it multiple times - presumably by charging up local energy storage and releasing it quickly. Scaling this up is obviously a challenge though.

    3. The weird mix of metric prefixes (mega) and standard numbers (trillions) in a single sentence is a bit triggering - that might just be me though.