“A toast to my big brother George, the richest man in town.”
Alternatively:
“You are who you choose to be.”
“Superman.”
“A toast to my big brother George, the richest man in town.”
Alternatively:
“You are who you choose to be.”
“Superman.”
“I want tell you about the town of Stockbridge, Massachusets, where this happened here, they got three stop signs, two police officers, and one police car, but when we got to the Scene of the Crime there was five police officers and three police cars, being the biggest crime of the last fifty years, and everybody wanted to get in the newspaper story about it.” - Arlo Guthrie, Alice’s Restaurant Massacree
Yes, but not because the horse has claws and likes playing with its prey before it kills it.
Small enough to be afraid to dismount.
No I do not. I don’t think they support genocide either, but they do support a country committing genocide, which is absolutely disgusting too. But I’m perhaps splitting hairs there.
I make no distinction between the two, and I consider your hair splitting to be an attempt to downplay it.
Do you think they support a country committing genocide because people are voting for them?
I think they support genocide regardless of who voted for them. I think they do so for the sheer love of it. If you support genocide you lose the benefit of the doubt.
Douglas Adams’ middle name was “Noel”, not “and”.
Do you suppose genocide has always been something Democrats were so eager to support?
I don’t think I made any claims that this was a fluke. If so, it wasn’t meant to be received as such. I’m merely saying that one election is not enough to go on.
And now that I’ve cited multiple elections, can we put that “we only have one election” thing to bed?
And I don’t know enough to make any claims about the history. I’m merely saying we have to look at the history to make any claims. This type of theorem can’t be based on one election. That’s all I’m saying.
How convenient that you only know one election when I bring up the previous two cycles of the phenomenon I described, but up until this moment, you were certain that this one election was a fluke.
He’s a US citizen, isn’t he?
For one election?
Which of GWB’s rightward policies did Obama undo? Which of Reagan/Bush’s policies did Clinton undo?
You’re defending a rightward shift that has been going on for decades.
Does the rightward shift that has resulted in the “good” party supporting genocide indicate stability to you?
Welp, you just saw that “damage control” has a limit. People will stay home if they see insufficient difference between the two pro-genocide parties.
Sorry, I thought I made it clear. What Biden did when he supported genocide for you is not “damage control” even though you love him for it.
and the Biden administration did more to restrict sales than most
Oh? Provide examples.
How many times do you want to move to the right and not back to the left? How many more times will it take to satisfy you?
Well, shouting at the electorate to shut up and love genocide because it’s the “lesser” evil didn’t work.
Was supporting genocide “damage control?”
Here’s the question I asked.
Pray tell, how is strengthening unions & workers rights
Strikebreaking and photo ops didn’t strengthen shit.
forgiving student loans
Was the only bright spot in his presidency.
Now how was supporting a genocide “left?” I mean, it may be to your left. Maybe you want active participation?
Philip J. Fry was named after Phil Hartman.
To carry on his spirit.