

This is until you do multivariate functions. Then you get for f(x(t), y(t)) this: df/dt = df/dx * dx/dt + df/dy * dy/dt
This is until you do multivariate functions. Then you get for f(x(t), y(t)) this: df/dt = df/dx * dx/dt + df/dy * dy/dt
This is good actually, because it will reduce the brain drain of other countries. Critical support for JDPON Don.
Bears usually avoid humans, unless very hungry, because those who didn’t avoid us, didn’t tend to live very long.
The truth is though that ultimately, politicians are gonna be malleable to those who are going to vote
No, they are not. A single donation from a billionaire would buy more press to get more voters from name recognition than a million working class supporters. And if the politician betrays his base, the most he can fear is losing reelection, and even this is not assured. If a politician goes against billionaires, he is going to be smeared, harassed and have his opposition funded. This ensures that the only politicians in any significant elections are already guaranteed to serve billionaires.
The first entry in the logs you assemble to discover the lead up to disaster:
Thinking of politics in terms of good guys and bad guys is kindergarten-level.
This is literally Budenny.
I played it a lot when I was in school.
Consistency of an axiomatic system that contains arithmetic can be proven in this system if and only if it is inconsistent.
Americans are not flirting with Nazism. They dated it, married it and had many children with it.
Pelevin was satirizing 90s’ Russia and its emerging capitalist culture and his critiques still stand, because Putin’s Russia is just less fucked up version of 90s’ Russia. Trying to reduce his works to “satires of authoritarianism” is extreme cherry-picking.
https://www.lmfdb.org/ for people deep into analytic number theory rabbit hole.
Democrats won’t abandon norms and traditions, because they play a good cop to Republicans’ bad cop. They are all in one big club and you aren’t in it.
Genets are bad example, because Viverridae are the closest relatives to Felidae. Convergent evolution would be better illustrated by fish and dolphins.
Shrikes are cute.
We are heading into a great world, where the computers will be doing intellectual and creative stuff, while humans will be doing manual labour.
No, most people in 1903 lived not that much differently from the Medieval times. Urbanization was still low then. An average person from 1969 would adapt to 2025 much faster then an average person from 1903 to 1969.