Yes phones need to have at least these requirements to fullfill GrapheneOS standards:
Yes phones need to have at least these requirements to fullfill GrapheneOS standards:
Yes GrapheneOS only supports pixel devices, as these are the only phones that have a high enough security standard.
People should stop using .tar.gz or .zip
They both are not horribly bad, but .tar.zst is just the best option we have, as zstandard is pareto optimal
https://insanity.industries/post/pareto-optimal-compression/
I use arch btw
GrapheneOS is the best android custom ROM by far. It is more secure, it gets updated very often and security patches land on my phone faster than I hear about them. It is way more performant than the default ROM that ships with Pixel Phones, my battery lasts for days if I don’t use the phone.
At first I was very sceptical, as I want to be sure I can rely on my phone. But it is super stable, way better than the Samsung ROM I had before.
Me reading the first word of each sentence instead of the first letter
Knork/10
According to people from GrapheneOS these are two different things:
To be clear, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.devicelock is not what’s included in GrapheneOS. There seems to be some confusion about that. This is the app that does what’s being described.
What you see in GrapheneOS is https://android.googlesource.com/platform/packages/modules/DeviceLock/+/b1a971a6e29f5b426b13d96d7692e9dd5a7e81e2/DeviceLockController/
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/11639-device-lock-controller/9
⠀
Fixed
On custom roms like grapheneos you can change the domain it connects to. Om grapheneos it defaults to servers hosted by grapheneos.
) Plesse close that parentheses
Already exists but not in a good shape for “normie” use
Ooh I found it a bit confusing as I collapse comments very often, and it looked similar to it
Finally I understand this comic, I’ve seen it some time ago and was just confused
At least it is royality free compared to HDMI which has a large annual fee + per unit fee for manufacturers
https://askubuntu.com/a/1495289
Take a look at the GitHub issue, seems to be in the works and a patch seems to be already available.
(I did only search the web for like 5 minutes, I don’t have any clue about the subject)
Found the link above in this archlinux forum post https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=291502
AutoTldr does not use “AI”.
All these sentences can be found in the original article, it is just using a statistical approach which sentences to keep.
K removed 😂
😂😂😂 FYI, for your information
(Automod pls don’t flag)
Wdym?🤨