It would be just a matter of time before they can distinguish between good and bad data; there are already AI that can do just that. I’d like to do something like that on GitHub though:P

I understand, it would probably make sense narratively, but he would receive a lot of backslash.

Yeah, he basically spoiled the ending with the tv show and now he needs to come up with a new one. Not that he actually will. He’ll never finish the series

He probably couldn’t see the tv due to the big pile of money sitting between him and the screen covering his view.

Lol, I’m not exactly a fan of the series (I only really liked the first two books) but this is ridiculous. At this point he is just trolling. I’d say I’m happy I moved on. I haven’t even bought A dance with dragons because I couldn’t finish the one before that as I didn’t really like it. That being said, I’d like to get a conclusion to the story and I’m willing to go back to the series AFTER it’s concluded (which most likely will never happen).

Not yet. I have mini metro though. Very similar but somewhat different feeling. It’s probably the closest thing.

Code review can’t fix incompence though. I lost count of how many times my boss told me “review that PR well because X is not very good”. Also my point is that they are overrated, not that they are useless.

Probably unpopular opinion, but peer reviews are overrated. If coders are good AND know the project, the only thing you can do in a PR is nitpicking. They are more useful for open source collaborators because you want to double-check their code fits with the current architecture. But people here are reacting as if peer reviews could actually spot bugs that tests can’t catch. That happens rarely unless the contributor is junion/not good.

I would fire you for incompetence and sabotage. Problem solved.

Follow up of: “Mmm… should I put lifecycle annotation in these 10 structs or just use and Rc and call it a day?”. Rc and Box FTW.

I second this game. The cat can also find a mate abd have kittens