You can still have multiple gears if you attach a gear box to the electric motor. Some BEVs already do that.

This one? https://youtu.be/0Hwjmek0Uvw It more addresses survivability in space, but unfortunately not the „drain earth of its atmosphere“ thing. Then again, in game the portal was closed quickly again.

I remember that video, but I‘m not sure it is comparable — air might flow faster than water [citation needed] and there might be less of it [citation needed].

How fast would this suck up all of our atmosphere? Hours? Days?

No, it’s just fertilized with bullshit.

Thanks, I’ll look into it. For completionists: This is the article about how to properly archive paper: https://peelarchivesblog.com/2024/09/10/how-do-archivists-package-things-the-battle-of-the-boxes/

Thanks, this sounds really useful. Patch T sounds like some manual sorting work, but I guess with the option to reuse those separator pages it is still better than manual splitting or - worse - single scanning.

I haven’t looked into paperless-ai yet, but I hope my machine would be beefy enough for this task — worst case I guess it might take a little longer to process all docs.

Now I only still need to decide on a good archiving method. I read some article a long time ago about the pros and cons of different document archiving methods used by professional archivers. Some prefer horizontal stacking in boxes, while others prefer vertical stacks in vertical boxes. Pretty interesting nerdy topic 😀

Interesting approach with the ASN — haven’t started using that feature yet. If I understand correctly, you add a QR ASN to each document you need to keep a physical copy of? And that sticker also has the ASN in human readable form? So you would then add many documents at once to the feeder, and Paperless will read the QR and also split documents whenever a new code appears?

What about documents you don’t want to keep physically? Is there a way to get Paperless to split them automatically as well if you add many to the feeder?

Hehe, nice. Haven’t heard that one before.

Macarena!

As an aphantastic person I am on the opposite end I guess.¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Bookmarked. Though I guess it comes down to an „I can return my printer and get a full or partial refund“? Which, as long as no good alternative presents itself, doesn’t help me.

I know we don’t want to talk alternatives here, but that might still be an interesting discussion to have, once we get there.

You’d get a pious, stating that someone paid 1.99 to turn your camera an. For just 5.99 you can make sure it stays off.

This could also be implemented as a bidding war like eBay.

Ryan started the fire!

Dual mouse mode sounds interesting…

I understood that reference.

Funny…

Hm… like some „press button in printer now to initiate key exchange“? Sounds like a good idea, and pretty straightforward. I like it.

Like I said, I’m just playing devils advocate to understand the full picture better.

The LAN being secure might not be an issue for you and me, but the average user might not be so skilled. Though I understand your point that LAN security should not be Bambu‘s concern.

Regarding your NFT argument: I agree this is a valid concern, especially with the proxy being able to see everything sent to the printer. Though I hope the dev mode they promised would be enough to avoid that for now.