- 0 Posts
- 174 Comments
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•New packaging can warn you when meat has spoiledEnglish
25·11 days agoThey’re going to make this way too sensitive so people throw away even more food and effective prices get driven up. I guarantee it
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Tips to vet whether a person you are dating or know might be working for ICE?
8·18 days agoHave you considered… Asking them? If they lie they lie and you’ll find out they’re a shit person (and know it) pretty shortly.
But yeah if you want to get psycho about it just follow them to work.
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•I'd do it out of scientific curiosity.English
2·19 days agoPeople can die on the trolley,
Also you’re assuming the collatz conjecture.
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•I'd do it out of scientific curiosity.English
1·19 days agoHow long does it take to get an infinite number of loops in? Well, it’s going at a finite speed, so it must be an infinite amount of time. Maybe you can argue that at the speed of light causes the inside of the trolley to not experience time past that point, but there’s still all the time spent at sub-light speed accelerating. So at least an astronomical amount of time.
And the rules as stated result in an arbitrarily large number of people on the trolley. So these people after a point aren’t being pulled from Earth, they must be being created wholesale. And then living a life out on the trolley, unless they exit.
So the choices are really 1. Kill 5 people or 2. Create an unknown but large number of people that will live out some sort of lives on the trolley, or get shunted out into the real world, and some smaller but still large number of people that will die prematurely.
I think life is worth living, so I prefer 2
Not every men’s group is a shitty stereotype.
determine the relative “okayness” in an individual case
Well, yeah?
OP asked the question in general terms, I answered in general terms. With more specific information you can make a more specific judgement. That’s why I said “stereotype, not rule” and separated is vs ought?
I don’t need to list out every possible reason someone might want a gendered group to show that there is a valid reason. Instead just give one. In fact I avoided talking about domestic abuse shelters exactly to avoid this sort of ‘whataboutism’.
As ~always with gender and politics, there’s a pretty big gap between what is and what ought.
What is: The people who make and seek out men-only groups have a stereotype of being shitty, sexist people. The stereotypes around women-only groups are a lot weaker and less negative. These stereotypes are not rules, but do certainly lead to some social stigma.
What ought 1: In a better world gender-specific groups might exist for people to find support and connection around their gendered experiences. There’s some experiences that aren’t commonly shared across genders and it can be a lot easier and safer to share with people who you know also have that experience.
What ought 2: In a still better world there wouldn’t be a significant desire for such groups because we are all sensitive and caring enough that such a group doesn’t make sharing meaningfully easier or safer, because it’s already easy and safe.
X-Clacks-Overhead
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Drug dealers hate this one weird trick!
151·1 month agoBe careful to make sure that it doesn’t spoil faster in water. And that it doesn’t settle
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Do you think you would survive if you received every injury of your life at once?
2·1 month agoYes. Haven’t even had any really bad scrapes or anything.
Some odd I pass out from blood loss (like everyone). Or pain. Also I’m gonna have even more wicked scars on the sides of my fingers. But like, no broken bones and no major trauma is just really survivable.
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
science@lemmy.world•He made beer that’s also a vaccine. Now controversy is brewingEnglish
4·1 month agoCritics say this needs more testing - cool sure let’s make that happen! I don’t think its wrong to publish data from 1 or 2 people, so long as you don’t present that data as definitive.
Fuck you Un-guy’s your Fieri


Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The lyrics to "if you're happy and you know it" imply you can be happy and not know it
2·1 month agoMost of the time, yeah
Atlas_@lemmy.worldto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•I would like to know what native English speakers think of my writing?
1·1 month agoExcellent! Lots of other people in thread have made minor corrections (that are mostly accurate) but you have a far more important thing - STYLE! Your penmanship has a great style made in part by those little differences! Don’t change it so much you lose that




If the servers have public IPs and you want the minimum possible ports open, just SSH? With passwords disabled and large keys, it’s quite secure.
If that’s still not enough for you or you need a private gateway, then Wireguard. I can strongly recommend Tailscale - It’s really an orchestration layer on top of Wireguard. You can setup your own Derp relays and head scale if you are truly paranoid. But 99.9% you don’t need all that and Tailscale out of the box will work well.
Also Tailscale isn’t a single point of failure the way you’re imagining. It’s certainly possible for Tailscale’s servers to go down, but that won’t drop existing connections.