• Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Missing: any sort of physicist who will tell them both that the forward model says that the sun won’t explode for a few billion years, and so far that model hasn’t been wrong.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Minor correction: in a few billion years our sun will expand into its red giant death phase.

      Also: our star can’t go nova by our understanding of astrophysics. If it actually can, then we might need to throw out a lot of astrophysics, including predictions on when our star will expand.

      Also also: the odds of the dice giving double 6s is MUCH higher than our sun going nova at any point in time even if it could go nova and was overdue.

      • triclops6@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That last part is what the Bayesian scientist is wagering on, it’s not missing, as op suggested

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, gotcha. I tried learning Bayesian probability once and failed utterly. One of the only classes I just barely passed (stat was the other). My brain just barely computes it.