jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down16
arrow-up1154arrow-down1external-linkA Demographic Time Bomb Is About to Hit the Beef Industrywww.wired.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism https://sentientism.info/
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agothat’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoRight, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoeven among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agosentientism is compatible with deontology
minus-squarespud@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 years agoaccording to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiocentrism
https://sentientism.info/
that’s not my ethical system. most people don’t subscribe to it.
Right, most people subscribe to their holy book(s) of choice
even among professional philosophers the prevailing ethical system is deontology
sentientism is compatible with deontology
according to some, but kant never went in for it. the strongest attempt to marry them seems to be from korsgaard, but howe treated her argument pretty roughly in “why kant animals have rights” (2019)