• The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Embrace, extend and destroy is a known, well established, concept. Microsoft was quite open about how this is to be done.

    It has already happened to established decentralised networks. See here!

    Maybe it won’t happen to Mastodon, maybe they have the masterminds who can counter it. But it is imo pretty clear that this is what Meta plans to do.

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Read their privacy policy. They already admitted they will scrape info from 3rd party users/communities which interact with their users.

      This is not a good thing.

    • thathoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really see an argument for “extinguish” on that article. It looks like just “embrace, expand, unembrace.” I can think of a few reasons how meta could degrade the quality of the metaverse, but the example of xmpp doesn’t quite smell right - activitupub is mature (even if I disagree with lot of the core specs), and the fediverse is much more about “eventual consistency” instead of real-time chats where both side have to be online at the same time.

      I don’t really see an argument where Google drew people away from xmpp - the author themself said that nobody cared about the few xmpp users, so it’s not like Google was drawing long-time xmpp users away.

      I’d love to hear other opinions on that article.

        • btmoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they want to train AI models. They don’t give a shit about taking over ActivityPub.