• PrometheusG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They replace AP with something else internally and abandon AP. If anyone wants to keep talking to them, they’ve got to hop onboard whatever they’ve replaced AP with. This effectively kills AP (theoretically).

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would it kill AP if there is a set of users that don’t care about those features but just their privacy?

      Just don’t use Meta’s app or switch. I just don’t understand personally how this removed every other server instance using AP out of the equation if FB would just be closing themselves off even if they did build something better or useful.

      • zuhayr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need to remember that ActivityPub and this entire fediverse is only to allow small, individual communities to live without a major corporation able to pull the plug. It’s not privacy centric at all. In fact, quite far from it.

        • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t understand that either? I thought the Fediverse was privacy first driven? I don’t really understand how it couldn’t be when you can wall off Threads if you choose to do so?

          • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            AP is just a networking protocol for communication between several servers. You should assume everything you to is 1000% public and easily gathered by everyone that wants to