Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

  • usernotfound@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Every time that “Argument” happens it’s openly done in biologically unfounded ways by people who simply don’t understand how our bodies actually work.

    I’ll be the first to admit I don’t know how our bodies work, but I think explaining it will be more helpful in the long run than just making the subject taboo and banning everyone who asks it.

    At the beginning of the pandemic a common argument against masks was “the virus is too small to be caught in a mask” - which made sense from a layman’s point of view. When people started explaining that masks did stop the water droplets the virus needs to be airborne - that argument become a lot less common.

    Not everybody who has questions is “just asking questions”, if you catch my drift.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not everybody who has questions is “just asking questions”, if you catch my drift.

      I agree with that statement, context is everything.

      I think that in the context of someone starting out going “it’s unfair for men to compete in women’s sports,” the person is “just asking questions.” That context poisons the well for questions.

      But if someone comes in and makes a thread like “I don’t understand how hormone therapy works, can someone please explain it?” that, to me, is a good faith question and 100% should not be bannable.

      • usernotfound@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        All good :)

        Now that I have your attention though, what would be a good counter argument on why trans women should be allowed to compete in the same league as non-trans women (please excuse my lacking vocabulary)?

        Like I mentioned, at first sight as a layman, the argument that trans women would have an competitive advantage makes sense to me. So I’d be grateful if you could take away my ignorance.

        • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          First for the vocabulary:

          non-trans = cisgender. cis meaning “same,” as in “same gender as assigned at birth.”

          Second, I’m not the best at doing that, but I know of a really good report which has good citations of studies and really thoroughly discusses the issue. PDF WARNING: It can be found here.

          • usernotfound@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thanks for the former, guess I should have known that, but I’ll be sure to remember now. As for the second… I’m interested in the answer, but not 86 pages scientific report interested. Guess I’ll just have to wait around for the “water droplet”-size answer, but thanks for your patience nonetheless :)