In exchange for the resettling of Palestinians, the administration would potentially release to Libya billions of dollars of funds that the U.S. froze more than a decade ago, those three people said.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 小时前

    You said: “Nazis wanted to kill them all, not move them further away.” I pointed out that’s historically inaccurate

    Historically inaccurate in early years when barely anyone paid attention to nazi germany.

    Historically accurate in relevant years.

    You keep insisting I’m making “extreme” comparisons. But all I’ve done is point to a well-documented historical pattern: the Nazis didn’t begin with gas chambers. They started with deportation plans, ghettos, and forced removals. That’s not hyperbole: it’s basic historiography.

    But do you not see how this argument is flawed? Evolution is not a one way street. It takes different routes. Just because something starts with x does not 100% mean it will always end with y, especially in vastly different timeline where I highly doubt this can happen with masses in a country that got all eyes on them. They’d be done and they know it.

    Your historical documentations about what happened in country X is NOT a prophecy about country Y. Politics is not a mathematics that follows a formula.

    Also, please stop using ChatGPT to refine your answers.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 小时前

      I am not making prophecies. I am not predicting the future. I am specifically writing:

      When people defend or downplay proposals to forcibly remove an entire population […] the comparison isn’t extreme. It’s cautionary.

      Do you understand what that phrase means? Do you understand what the word “cautionary” means?

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 分钟前

        I understand, but what I’m saying from my perspective is that I do not see that happening in any way possible, even if the beginning phase looks like startup nazi ideology. One can be cautious about new nuclear reactor in France exploding because one exploded in Chornobyl, while others, like me, will try to assure you it’s quite impossible under new designs (new world order).

        Like I said before, if Israel actually goes ahead and kills those millions Palestinians instead of displacing them, get back to me and I will write an apology letter for my ignorance and short-sightness, but as of things stand now, I simply don’t see how is it possible for Israel to do this without causing their own destruction.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 分钟前

          If you look at our discussion you might notice that at no point have I singled out Israel as the only possible perpetrator. We are literally discussing this in the thread below an article about the American government making genocidal plans. Between Trumpist USA and the far right current Israeli government, an escalation is not inconceivable. It is true however that thankfully there are multiple actors, from the Europeans to the Egyptians and Jordanians for example, who would not easily allow something like this to happen. But then again, if the world order is blown up in WW3, anything is possible and these kinds of plans would become much less unworkable… Which is why calling them out and not letting them be normalized now is very important.