• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And that’s a good thing, if and only if you provide pathways to other jobs or phase workers out slowly i.e. by retirement.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I have had a number of conversations with relatively reasonable conservatives, where I’ve brought up the dangers of so many jobs moving toward automation with no additional job creation. And steering the conversation carefully, I got them to at least consider the idea of UBI funded by taxing any and all automation. I also got them (with the “everybody should have to work, people shouldn’t get life handed to them for free” mentality) to agree that the rise in automation should mean people working less hours each, so everyone still has jobs (basically, UBI and changing “full time” to 25 or 30 hours, where people get overtime past that… creating more jobs while peoples needs are still covered).

        It’s amazing, sometimes, how starting with some similar premises (people should have to work, which I mostly agree with) and shared threat (automation taking jobs) can lead to some more open minds for things that they would otherwise be adamantly against.