• rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    More corporate welfare. Sweet. Billionaires need their handouts, after all.

    Meanwhile, the working class gets shafted harder than ever.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So we have money for this, but can’t build public housing. Right.

    If oil is so profitable, let the oil companies foot the bill themselves.

    • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly this. All that “free market” talk always seems full of promise and idealism and then the government OKs subsidies like this and it’s just naked corporatism through and through.

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is this the one that goes through reservations, where we send the RCMP to steal even more land and displace the protesting natives?

  • asg101@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Blocking affordable EVs while building oil pipelines… that’s some bold commitment to stopping climate change!

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately I support doing this so we can wean off American money.

    I know this didn’t start with trumps tariffs, and I know fossil fuels are awful, and fossil fuel companies are among the worst.

    I support this because oils create more than just fuel, and we’re in a drowning moment and need a lifeline.

    • Bones747@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I agree with you there. Feels like the necessary evil to weather the storm. It doesn’t mean you have to stop investing in green energy. But we still need fuel until that transition can fully happen and so does the rest of the planet.

      • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The big problem here is that we’re eventually going to hit global peak oil use. Building out new infrastructure like this takes nearly a decade to complete, and paying it off usually takes multiple decades. If it’s going to take you 20 years at 100% capacity to pay off, and 10 years to build, and we reach peak oil earlier than 30 years from now (the IEA predicts 2030, however other international agencies push that out as far as 2050), then building extra capacity just doesn’t make sense.

        If the IEA models are correct, then we wouldn’t even be finished expanding or building any new pipelines before global oil demand starts to drop. That risks a big drop in prices, which makes it more difficult to pay off any new pipelines once they come online as transit fees bottom out. And then taxpayers are stuck holding the bag.

  • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love listening to people talk about Trudeau in the office:

    He does nothing for oil companies that “drive our economy.”

    He also wastes money on TMX.

    He also doesn’t do enough to separate our economy from the states, like building TMX.

    He also doesn’t do enough to tie pur economy to the states.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is federal government providing favourable financing to the private sector?

    Seems like communism to me tbh

    For the owner class that is