cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23718803

Summary

The Taliban have banned windows in homes that allow views of areas where Afghan women might be seen, citing concerns over “obscene acts.”

This new decree mandates blocking or obstructing such windows in existing and new buildings, continuing the group’s systemic repression of women since regaining control of Afghanistan in August 2021.

The Taliban’s policies have included bans on women’s education, public appearances, and voices.

Critics, including the U.N., warn these actions dangerously erode human rights, while activists call out global inaction over the ongoing oppression.

    • josefo@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      That was never taken literally by christians, where Jesus is god incarnate, why would ever work for islam where he is just considered a prophet.

      • AugustWest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Convenient that the parables and commands suggesting persecution of those different than yourself must be taken literally, but when Jesus says something that impacts you directly, suddenly he’s a master of metaphor.

        • josefo@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I call it Quantum superposition Jesus, or Schrödinger’s Messiah.

          To be fair, the stuff “mandating” persecution are mostly weird interpretations to justify agenda of a later imperial church. When being honest with the author intent and reading stuff in context, it’s never the case. And don’t get me started with modern “bible study” that ultimately leads to the current state of the far right and zionist apartheid support.

          The few things I have parsed from the Quran, I think is not the same case. That thing was straight up written to justify holy war.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            That thing was straight up written to justify holy war.

            Huh? Okay that’s straight up wrong. The Muslim state in Medina was fighting a defensive war for most/all of its existence during the time of Muhammed, so there was literally no need to justify anything. I’m willing to bet you read a bunch of random verses shown by an islamophobe with zero context.

            • josefo@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I’ll admit I didn’t dig a lot on the context, but I opened the book at random and literally the first thing I found was something along the lines of “yeah, just kill these people and do not forgive them under any circumstances, as they are your enemies”. I did it a couple more of times and found similar stuff. The book wasn’t mine so I couldn’t dig a lot on it at the moment.

              I mean, I remember thinking “this book is newer than christianity, how bad could it be?” and then I was nope nope nope…

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                “yeah, just kill these people and do not forgive them under any circumstances, as they are your enemies”

                Yeah I’m pretty sure you misunderstood something, because “do not forgive them under any circumstances” doesn’t come up anywhere in the Quran and ignoring that part the one example that comes to mind has “if they choose peace choose it too” right after.

                • josefo@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  So, Islam is a religion of peace as long as the other end is peaceful too? Do to others what they do to you. If they start a fight, continue it, and escalate it until total obliteration. Unless there other side now has chosen peace, then don’t exterminate them. Yeah, revolutionary spiritual teachings, very deep.

                  This exchange of arguments actually has planted the seed of wanting to know about Islam better, so I can totally criticize it with better arguments. My “I had the Quran once in my hands briefly and randomly read some out of context retrograde stuff there” pales in comparison to this great teaching you are bringing to the table.

                  I can see why countries that had some sort of Islamic revolution at some point are totally great places to live. Nothing inhumane happening there.

                  Seriously, thank you, this has lighten some really weird spark in me about wanting to know even more about religion as I do now. Do you have some recommended materials besides the word of the prophet himself? Some kind of commentary, dictionary, or reference? Anything that would help me navigate such fun and exciting waters. I’m honest with this part, I’m not sarcastic at all, I really want to understand it better.

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    If they start a fight, continue it, and escalate it until total obliteration.

                    Huh? Fuck no what the hell are you talking about? Islam has rules of engagement and explicitly forbids attacking non-combatants. Other than that in Islam Jihad has two purposes: protecting Muslims and spreading Islam, in that order. Neither are helped by a war of extermination, and historically Muslim states have been on the side of “convert or pay the tribute and we’ll leave you alone”.

                    I can see why countries that had some sort of Islamic revolution at some point are totally great places to live. Nothing inhumane happening there.

                    Okay seriously, why are you attributing that to Islam and not colonialism and the cold war? Secular post-colonial states in the Middle East aren’t doing much better.