Summary

Churches across the U.S. are grappling with dwindling attendance and financial instability, forcing many to close or sell properties.

The Diocese of Buffalo has shut down 100 parishes since the 2000s and plans to close 70 more. Nationwide, church membership has dropped from 80% in the 1940s to 45% today.

Some churches repurpose their land to survive, like Atlanta’s First United Methodist Church, which is building affordable housing.

Others, like Calcium Church in New York, make cutbacks to stay open. Leaders warn of the long-term risks of declining community and support for churches.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I think it counts as a third place. All it really takes to be a third place is not being home or work. Whether physical or not is definitely debatable and I think physical third places are a must, but I don’t think a third place being paid disqualifies it.

    For one, a lot of folks don’t have to pay for internet. I can go to my local library or community center and be online if needed. There are also some government programs that may provide free internet. But even if it is paid, typical third places have traditionally included settings like cafes, bars, the gym, bookstores, theaters, etc. which are also all pay-to-use environments.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Why’s that? Any enthusiast hobby is the basis of community, and that typically includes some degree of material investment into said hobby.

        I used to take martial arts classes, which was a great way to meet new people. And we’d have opportunities to get together and meet outside of our regularly scheduled classes, but the unifier that brought everyone together was the class that we were each paying to attend.

        I mean, even in the church example, you get guilted for not donating when they pass the collection box around. What difference is there with a community that shames you for not paying?

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sorry, I meant “can not” in the sense that we can’t let that be the basis of community.

          Commodified spaces and hobbies alienate people who can’t afford to pay. The church, at least, allows the poor to attend.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’m not sure if the church “allows” the poor insomuch as they simply need the poor. The vulnerable members of society are really the church’s only vehicle for growth, and so they take advantage of the needs of marginalized people to spread their ideology. Indoctrination masked behind charity. It’s more of an exploitative relationship in that regard.

            Secular meeting spaces with no cost would be preferred, and they definitely exist, but you’ll be hard pressed to find a sort of standardized approach across environments and demographics without the dictatorial voice of god (or the state) demanding compliance to the degree the church does, which makes it an institution.

            As another example, I also used to be part of a local Cantonese language practice meetup that would meet once weekly at our local mall. It was a small group, but we’d just sit at the food court and practice basic conversations. No barrier for entry, all welcome, but not the sort of thing that would have broad appeal, you know?

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I’m not sure if the church “allows” the poor insomuch as they simply need the poor.

              That’s a distinction without a difference.

              Commodified spaces do not need the poor, and in fact, they want them to go away.

              at our local mall

              Another public space that’s disappearing as malls close.

              • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Should also add that malls are not public. It may be something that can be typically accessed without paying, but they’ve made it quite clear in the past that it is not a forum for public use. Malls do plenty to kick the “undesirables” out.

                There are other public venues we could have used like parks or plazas but it’s hard to accommodate for cold winter weather where everyone wants to be indoors. A library might have worked if it wasn’t social etiquette to not talk in libraries.

                That’s a distinction without a difference.

                I don’t think that’s the case. Every scam needs suckers, that dependence doesn’t make it a good thing.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  True. If someone “looks” homeless a mall cop will come and escort them out.

                  What we need are communal indoor spaces. People ITT keep insisting libraries would allow for game nights but that seems alien and strange to me, not something I’ve ever heard.