• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    My top five Linux distros:

    1. Debian: It may not be exciting but its rock stability is what makes it good for the vast majority of people (aka what I would genuenly reccomend to people)
    2. Alpine: Not the easiest or most stable but very lightweight
    3. OpenSuse: Stable yet up to date, very good defaults and themeing is amazing (especially on Sway)
    4. Arch: Ignoring the community or documentation you get a distro with up to date packages and not much else to seperate it
    5. NixOS: Way too advanced for me but I love the way it works, seems amazing for a select type of people

    Of course my opinion is objectively correct and if you disagree im going to burn your house down with combustible lemons (made by my team of scientists ofc) /s

    • Twig@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      antiX is a pretty user friendly and light distro. Plus it’s Debian based.

        • Twig@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve yet to try Devuan, but I quite like the fact antiX has a bunch of stuff setup, like the WM with Rox and a bunch of apps etc

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Devuan is like Debian but without SystemD and much lighter. Like Debian however you set it up yourself so feel free to use whatever WM you want (I personally like Sway).

            • Twig@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              antiX doesn’t use SystemD, so that works for me. A nice balance between lightweight and being lazy and not having to set it up from scratch, but it doesn’t feel quite as janky as Puppy Linux.

              • psud@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                Why wouldn’t you like systemD? It’s easier to learn than most distributions

                I guess its commands are a bit long

              • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Imo when it comes to lightweight distros theres a reason why you set it up manually, when 100mb is the difference between a usable system it makes sense for the user to customize it to their needs.

                • Twig@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I get that. It depends what you’re after. I just wanted something that’d run on old hardware without too much effort.

                  • psud@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    23 hours ago

                    Debian is good for that, unless the system is a laptop with no RJ45 port and a wireless card which needs a non-free driver

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Debian: It may not be exciting but its rock stability is what makes it good for the vast majority of people (aka what I would genuenly reccomend to people)

      debian is what windows wishes it could be.