Riffing on the previous /c/gaming Witcher post I’m curious as to what people think is the better experience.

  • chaNcharge@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    HoS better story and villain, BaW better gameplay and setting.

    HoS has my favorite villain of all time with a really interesting story, while BaW felt like a whole new game. Hard to say which one is objectively better.

    • BinaryEnthusiast@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Personally I think the soundtrack for HoS was better too. GoD’s theme is a banger of a song, and I love the etherealness of the soundtrack

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    HoS had a much more streamlined story, and GoD is a really good villain.
    Having said that, it’s hard deny how good BaW was - it was basically a whole other game in a very beautiful settting. Both are good DLCs in their own way

    • Kaldo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I always say HoS is a better story but B&W is a better conclusion to the franchise. Both are special in their own way.

  • elroon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    HoS feels as if written by Sapkowski himself, it’s a brilliant, focused short story with a haunting atmosphere.

    BaW feels in its grander scale more like the base game and is a perfect ending with its lighter tones and more whimsical area.

  • Contortion@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I loved BaW, it was a great breath of fresh air after the dark and oppressive atmosphere of the main game.