In a Dec. 10 order, made public by the Article III Project on Tuesday, Diaz concluded that by publicly criticizing a Supreme Court justice’s ethics Ponsor’s essay diminished the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity.
Yeah! The Supreme Court can diminish the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity perfectly fine on their own! We don’t need you point their literal lack of ethics!
Imagine how ethically and intellectually bankrupt you have to be to note that publicizing something you do undermines public trust in your office, then conclude not that you’re wrong to do it, but that other people are wrong to publicize it.