This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.

And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

  • davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Follow up question: what is the purpose of the law? Why does it exist? What does that tell as about this case?

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      The law has been putting the screws down on regular people for generations and allowing the wealthy to get away with anything for generations. The law is fucked.

    • nelly_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Thomas Jefferson, 1787

      And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.

      I think this quote puts it aptly. It obviously comes from a more tumultuous time, but the United States was borne out of the idea that violence is a valid response to injustice. Law and order are preferable to anarchy, but that doesn’t mean that all law is valid. When the laws are used to insulate the powerful few against the many, what reason is there for the many to follow the law?

      This often-cited quote from Jefferson urges regular rebellion against the law so that the powerful will never lose sight of how tenuous their position is. If you let the powerful manipulate the laws for their own benefit against the interests of the rest of society, you’ll be left with a population that has no interest in upholding the law.

      That is ultimately why people are happy to let this man face no consequences. People are angry at the billionaires, especially those in the health insurance industry. And this action is being picked up as a warning shot across the bow. Society is saying that we are sick of the status quo, and if things keep going as they have been, this is not going to be an isolated event.