• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I find it utterly hilarious that the cited purpose is clarity, but the referenced comic required explanation. Bravo.

    Also thanks for the explanation because I wasn’t getting it, either. Makes sense, though. Give it a few hundred years and English might be so different the labels wouldn’t have mattered at all, let alone missing context.

    • thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing you just don’t know History very well, i didn’t need any sort of explanation to understand the comic.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Good for you! Totally and completely irrelevant to my point.

        The comic already required explanation … while it had text on it. Nothing you say, do, or believe will EVER change the fact that the comic required explanarion about as soon as it was posted.

        Grow up and realize you are not the main character. Your beliefs or knowledge do not change reality.