That liquid is called public swimming pool water you accidentally swallow.
Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
- 1 Post
- 685 Comments
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•15 degrees fahrenheit feels almost the same as 5 degrees. However 35 degrees feels WAY colder than 45 degrees.
1·1 day agoAh, that makes a bit more sense.
Maximum body temperature should be pretty obvious - at least with one or two degrees (Celsius) of wiggle room.
Though, with minimum body temperature, do you mean minimum while conscious or minimum survivable? Because there have been cases where people were successfully resuscitated after being submerged in freezing water for a very long time:
An 8-year-old boy fell through pond ice and was submerged for ≥147 minutes. Nadir peripheral body temperature was 7 °C (45 °F). After rewarming with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prolonged hospitalization, and neurorehabilitation, the child recovered.
At 6-month follow-up, he was giving short commands, standing without support, riding a tricycle, eating soft foods, and relearning simple tasks.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•15 degrees fahrenheit feels almost the same as 5 degrees. However 35 degrees feels WAY colder than 45 degrees.
21·1 day agoHumans are mostly water though.
And your scale makes even less sense because you are ignoring time and air moisture (for the maximum temperature). You would probably die very quickly in a 120°C hot sauna if it had 100% moisture.
Same with the cold: I’d not survive much longer than a minute in -50°C without clothes but with adequate protection several hours seems possible.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Epstein details scrubbed from Mandelson’s Wikipedia page by shady paid editor— As the then-ambassador came under fire, an anonymous user tried to downplay his history of support for Jeffrey EpsteinEnglish
4·3 days agoWikipedia isn’t important because of its data. Rather because of the fact it is continuously updated, extended, and fixed at a gigantic scale.
If Wikipedia ever dies, its information will lose relevance by the day. After a decade or two without a similar-scale replacement, will anyone even care?
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•When you're smarter than the teacher that wrote the test
3·10 days agoYou didn’t specify the unit.
What if the unit was points^-200 ?
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Uplifting News@lemmy.world•Swift bricks become mandatory for new buildings in ScotlandEnglish
2·11 days agoIt was used in my (German) university’s English classes.
To be fair, they are taught by native speakers. But still!
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Italy’s foreign minister defends ICE attendance at Winter Olympics after outrage: ‘It’s not like the SS are coming’English
3·16 days agoYeah, FBI and or CIA would be (are?) the US’s Gestapo. I mean, they already have torture facilities to get false confessions.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Every day, boss makes a dollar, I make a dime...
6·16 days agoWhat a nice company, providing its employees with free product samples!
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•2000 years ago the Romans had it figured out that letting people have weapons in cities was a bad idea.
116·17 days agoOh no, the workers have weapons! Anyways…
Marx died shortly after front-loaded muskets were replaced by the earliest rifles. You know, guns so terrible, a worker and trained soldier were somewhat matched.
From what I’ve heard, small arms were plenty available to civilians during the siege of Sarajevo. Yet they were absolutely worthless because it turns out modern soldiers are several orders of magnitude better equipped and deadly.
I’d purchase one if it 100% reliably cleaned both me and itself after use, without any (further) user interaction.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Neocities deindexed from BingEnglish
28·17 days agoBing/DDG has also blocked the emulation wiki (https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/) for some reason. I noticed when I forgot the domain and tried looking for the site.
For the record, Google returns it as the top result.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•What's it like living in 2?
8·22 days agoTo elaborate, it’s really easy to forge “regular” coins and really attractive to forge high value coins.
For example, the 1 British Pound coin was, before the redesign, widely forged:
As of March 2014 there were an estimated 1,553 million of the original nickel-brass coins in circulation,[6] of which the Royal Mint estimated in 2014 that just over 3% were counterfeit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_pound_coin
(Note for any languages that use the comma as a decimal separator: 1,553 million is referring to 1.5 billion)
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Ring Cameras Join Flock and Amazon to Now Create Direct Data Access for ICEEnglish
131·23 days agoReason #186729 why it’s insane to have no right to privacy in public.
Fun fact: Recording the public is illegal in Germany. Any private video camera must only be able to record your own property. If you do record (and store - smart doorbells without storage that are only active when they are rung are exempted) material you must have visible warnings (that others can see BEFORE being recorded) or else any evidence you collect is likely to be thrown out in court.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.deto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•For that modern web feeling
1·23 days agoOnly thing I can recommend (as well as for literally any script) is using set -u. Only because it’s awful to debug unset variables and there’s never a use case for using unset variables.
You seem to be wrong about the packaging criteria:
Packaging
The V-Label does not exclude products whose packaging contains animal-derived products. However, companies are encouraged to voluntarily avoid using packaging containing animal-derived products.
Yes, that is why I mentioned the IAU’s definition was more specific.
Very large? Enough mass to have a round shape.
Dwarf everything nearby? Clear out its orbit by colliding with/capturing/ejecting shit.
I propose a better definition:
Planets are very large objects orbitting a star that dwarf everything nearby
I’m pretty sure this is the intent of the IAU’s definition. It’s just more specific.
Do you mean the asteroids at the Lagrangian points? Every single planet has asteroids there because math/physics dictates those points to be stable. Jupiter has the most at its points because it’s the largest planet.
Same with Neptune cleaning its orbit: It has collided with every single thing in its orbit EXCEPT those that synced their orbits to Neptune. An object that is gravitationally dominated by a single planet should not be a planet under any definition.
Sources because I had to read into your claims and I’m no astrophysicist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_trans-Neptunian_object
Neither interpretation is wrong.
PEMDAS (or whatever you call it) is not a law and makes no mention of implicit multiplication. My Casio calculators rates implicit multiplication higher than explicit multiplication and division by the way.
Here’s another ambiguity:
Is 2½ equal to 1 or 2.5?
Depending on how you enter it, my Casio calculator returns either.
- If you create a normal fraction and then put a number in front (by going left with the arrows) it will result in 1
- Only if you use the dedicated “fraction with number in front” button will it result in 2.5



Please provide an example that fits in the Red/Blue overlap.