Colleagues must think im crying on the toilet but I’m trying to silently laugh tears. Thank you.

Thank you! I’m somewhat irritated by the comment section here. Like yeah, in some way it’s funny but it doesn’t take much imagination and empathy to get why it wouldn’t be funny to people in the hospital who are fatally ill or sth. It’s not just the one side making the joke who decides if it’s funny. Otherwise “it was just a prank bro” would be an okay excuse for any form of acting shitty.

He just called everyone in the population a billionaire and executed them without actually checking if they are in fact billionaires. Somewhat too close to reality in some scenarios for my taste…

No, only other groups are stupid, but not my group! /s

Rules have a purpose to serve. They can be changed and allow certain tags.

Or let’s say we leave the title and make it a [US] flair or marker or however that could be named. Not sure if lemmy already has that functionality.

Just saying there are possible solutions to this.

Yeah, I have only facts, non of those opinions.

Yeah, if we could stop ridiculing sience by parroting (and probably misrepresenting) stuff like this, that would be great…

When I see those headlines I don’t wonder anymore why some people dont take science as a whole seriously.

I don’t think anything comes as close to showcasing the extend of this pronunciation ridiculousness as the poem “The Chaos” by Gerard Nolst Trenité which is said to contain about 800 examples.

That pizza wheel arrow. :D

You gotta smell like goat (not the goat). Nasty suckers dont like that.

Thank you! Im really irritated by the amount and ratio of upvotes this post has.

Moon Moon … oh no wait, wrong thread.

Did Nintendo sue them by any chance?

It was originally named Arch de Omphe omphe omphe for the noise of the soldiers marching through it, but they got tired omphe it, I mean of it and renamed it to Triomphe. Not to be confused with victory.

Sadly I can only upvote once to show appreciation for your well put together wall of text. Nice word masonry :)

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Also it’s not that they can’t be seen, it’s just that the effort required to spot them is greater and the likelihood to miss something is higher.

Greater compared to human code? Not sure about that, but I’m not disagreeing either. Greater compared to verified able programmers, sure, but in general?..

I also really really dislike the non-declarative nature of generated code, which fundamentally rules it out as a reliable end to end system tool unless we can get those fully comprehensive tests up to scratch, for me at least.

I don’t think I’m getting your point here. Do you mean by that, the code basically lacks focus on an end goal? Or are you talking about the fuzzyness and randomization of the output?

Right, fair point with the training data.

Thanks, I think your first point is a really valid one. AI technology is far from clean, especially in a political scope.

To your second point. I see that, but on the other hand, it makes an impression on me as if human code would be free of such errors. I would not put human code on an (implied) pedestal (especially not mine), but maybe I’m missing your point. I think being suspicious about AI code is good but same goes for human code. To me it sounds like nobody should ever trust AI code because there can or will be mistakes you can’t see, which is reasonably careful at best and paranoid at worst. At some point there is no difference anymore between “it looks fine” and “it is fine”.

I don’t see it as obfuscation if there is no underlying difference. Why treat working code differently depending on the source if what matters is that it works (which it does by definition). Of course there has to be more quality control if AI is able to produce more code, but I don’t think that’s the point here right? Why highlight the different sources of the code if, as you said, the code can speak for itself. What’s the difference to you if you can’t tell them apart?

Yup, single dev here, can confirm. I’m coding for a living but am mediocre at it since I jumped from civil engineering to something I kind of enjoy. To me coding assistants are a huge help. Finding solutions, discussing ideas, writing down implementation plans, can’t do all that stuff with my colleagues since they have no clue about my work.