why did it fail? is it stupid?

it’s quite clever but its UI is not that comfortable to use, non tech-savvy people will struggle a lot with it

• the corporate side of Red Hat is far less evident on Fedora than Canonical’s on Ubuntu

• vanilla UX

• Atomic editions

• fast yet stable updates

• more lightweight ISO

it also has disadvantages, specially for nontechnical folks

• Free Software Policy (NVIDIA drivers and some codecs not pre-installed)
• non LTS version available (Atomic desktops are easier to manage if keeping un-updated for very long periods)
• it uses RPM packages which are good, but there might be some software only offering DEBs (containers and extraction tools can help with that)

and you beat ‘em naked too?

not hating, just saying that now that systemd-boot is being seen as a “modern” successor to GRUB it would feel to people who don’t like systemd like “oh no they’re replacing another standard tool with their own thing”

but the thing is, a lot of systemd tools have been adopted because they actually made work easier for people maintaining projects

I’m using Universal Blue as a reference because of their position of adopting novelty tools like bootc even before Fedora

now, their newest project Dakota is going to use systemd-boot to provide a full chain of trust

maybe systemd-boot seemed like the best option, it’s not like sD devs forced them to adopt their option

so it’s nice to see ACTUAL good projects so the freedom to choose doesn’t always mean giving up to the “best/easier” option

that’s awesome

the thing with systemd “taking over”anything also has to do with it offering options that actually lessens efforts

nice to see another option apart from systemd-boot

this is the kind of things the uBlue project would be interested in looking forward to

maybe it’s a way to make the ambient feel “elegant” and classy it happens a lot in clothing stores

no systemD?!? gonna check it out

mosquitoes’ lifecycle is quite terrifying the more you think about it, and that’s not even the scariest ones in nature

sudo Montanactl status

good ending

would

this is hilarious both as a joke and a serious question

guys, I finally get it

the philosophy behind Budgie is “lightweight yet feature packed, no default reference UX”

this is cool considering it has strong Wayland support, no wonder why Fedora Atomic desktops offer Budgie instead of LXQt

it’s sort of similar to Cinnamon

it’s cuffin season

it’s all systemD fault!

lol what in the actual heck

you have NO IDEA the uses you could give to vibrator mode on the phone 😈

omg you made it in a very GNOME-native way :D will try it as soon as i get my device back!

hi, what I meant was…

you told me that update —preview would be redundant if we can check the deployment anyways after the update

in that case, we can instead see update —check as a brief summary and also as a way to ask for confirmation, it wouldn’t need that much space to display

btw nice to see you here, I don’t have Github or Reddit accounts to give feedback on there :)

lol I forgot we can inspect the deployment after that, I just think that it feels a little harsh to just press “update” blindly without knowing anything about the download, rpm-partee update —check also exists to avoid redundancies