Calling it “advertising” comes from a perspective that women are necessarily focused only on men, and trying to trick men.
Isn’t that true sometimes?
Calling it “advertising” comes from a perspective that women are necessarily focused only on men, and trying to trick men.
Isn’t that true sometimes?
It ain’t the size that matters
… Unless said size is too small
Calling yoga pants a false advertisement is misogyny?


Oh no… Imagine tiktok content in those times
The water looks slimy, especially right of the nose.
Now would it be a CP or a CSAM in the case of the video of children consentingly doing it between themselves?
What if all the bike is covered in it?
Only abstract is available by that link.
And the abstract doesn’t support your exact claims.
Also:
group of adolescent sibling incest offenders (n=21) compared to a group of adolescent non-sibling offenders (n=24).
Do you call this well studied?


I started growing our own produce
And meats?
No, the burger day you didn’t.
Maybe that’s inbreeding grammar, what do we know
And that’s why you’re alive and she’s your ex, right?
If you prefer dating humans without genetic defects, congratulations; you’re a eugenicist.
Colloquially eugenics refers not to personal preferences, but to collective imperatives, as far as I know.
Why is it fine for parents with documented genetic conditions to do the same?
While I tend to agree, that’s a highly controversial view (see eugenics).
I don’t think we have enough data to make that assumption.
Do you call sealioning every question you feel lazy to answer to?