• something_random_tho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Crazy how American gov claims the EU is unfairly targeting American companies… if the American gov did its job to break up these monopolies, the EU wouldn’t need to in the first place!

  • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    In all honesty there was a period of time I thought all hope was lost but EU seems to be the last knight standing against these greedy mf.

    We all have to bear in mind these lawmakers are fighting against enemies with near limitless resources so give credit where it is due and let’s back them up as much as possible!

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          A lot of them are affiliated with the government of Ireland, which acts as a tax and legislatory haven for most of these companies in the EU. Only recently have member state data protection authorities started to bring cases forward, and IIRC Meta tried to argue itself out of a fine issued in Norway by saying that it needs to be fined in Ireland.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The EU has designated six companies as gatekeepers, which it defines as large digital platforms providing “core” services like app stores, search engines, and web browsers.

    Alphabet has a sprawling empire, stretching from a dominant search engine to a major web browser and popular mobile operating system, with many services interlinked to augment their power.

    Apple has fiercely contested its services falling under the DMA, arguing that it actually runs five separate App Stores (which would be conveniently small enough to avoid the EU regulation) instead of a single platform.

    While that gambit wasn’t successful, it did convince the EU commission that iMessage doesn’t qualify as gatekeeper service, avoiding requirements to make it interoperable with other messaging platforms.

    The choice to lean on a paid option resulted in a lawsuit from the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), which claimed the “very high subscription fee” meant users “do not have a real choice.” In January, Meta announced the gradual rollout of some other data protection features, including the ability to sever linked Facebook and Instagram accounts and manage them separately.

    Microsoft’s Windows operating system falls under the DMA’s regulations, and that’s changing how much the company promotes — or lets users avoid — numerous other apps and services inside it.


    The original article contains 2,180 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 90%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!